Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Fair Log Rubric - Grade 6
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Fair Log Rubric - Grade 6
Science Fair Log Rubric - Grade 6
Miami Arts Charter School 6th grade Science Fair Log Rubric. 6th grade Science teachers will use this rubric to to grade the log portion of your science fair project. Counts as a test grade.
Rubric Code:
GXC97CW
By
jelaniecomoda
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Science Log Grading Levels
Excellent
15 pts
Good
13 pts
Poor
10 pts
Incomplete
5 pts
Problem Statement & Background Info
Excellent
Student introduces specific, testable topic question, provides background information on science concepts related to the question, and explains why student is interested in the topic.
Good
Student introduces specific, testable topic question, provides background information on some science concepts, explains why student is interested in the topic.
Poor
Student introduces specific, testable topic question, but provides little background information on science concepts related to the question. Does not explain why student is interested in the topic.
Incomplete
Student is missing two or more of the following: topic question, background information, why student is interested in the topic.
Hypothesis
Excellent
HYPOTHESIS: is written as an If/Then statement. Is testable
Good
HYPOTHESIS: is written as an If/Then statement but is not testable. Is testable but is not written as an If/Then statement.
Poor
Incomplete
Hypothesis is not present
Materials
Excellent
MATERIALS:
ALL required materials are listed.
Good
MATERIALS:
Most required materials are listed.
Poor
MATERIALS:
Most required materials are listed.
Incomplete
Materials are not present
Procedure
Excellent
Steps are numbered, logical and thorough enough to be repeated without question or confusion.
Good
Steps are numbered, logical and thorough, but one or more steps are missing or confusing.
Poor
Steps are not detailed or logical. Somewhat confusing.
Incomplete
Procedure is not present
Variables
Excellent
Independent and dependent variables are correctly identified
Good
Independent and dependent variables are present but not correctly identified
Poor
Only one of the variables is identified
Incomplete
Variables are not present.
Data
Excellent
DATA:
Data is properly labeled and presented in all of the following ways:
___Data Table
___Graph
___Photos/Videos OR Illustrations
Good
DATA:
Data is properly labeled and presented in 2 of the following ways:
___Data Table
___Graph
___Photos/Videos OR Illustrations
Poor
DATA:
Data is not properly labeled and presented in only 1 of the following ways:
___Data Table
___Graph
___Photos/Videos OR Illustrations
Incomplete
Data is not present.
Results and Conclusion
Excellent
Conclusion is written as a paragraph and thoroughly discusses the results of the investigation. Student explains if hypothesis was supported or rejected.
Good
Conclusion is written as a paragraph and somewhat discusses the results of the investigation. Student explains if hypothesis was supported or rejected.
Poor
Conclusion is not written as a paragraph and only somewhat discusses the results of the investigation. Student does not explain if hypothesis was supported or rejected.
Incomplete
Conclusion is not present.
Title
Excellent
Title includes Project title, student's name, subject, teacher and science fair date. Title is bold-faced, centered mid-page and concisely addresses project topic.
Good
Title is missing one of the following: student's name, subject, teacher and science fair date. Title addresses project topic.
Poor
Title is missing two of the following: student's name, subject, teacher and science fair date. Title somewhat addresses project topic.
Incomplete
Title is missing.
Bibliography
Excellent
All sources are cited. Includes at least 3 different sources. No plagiarism!
Good
All sources are cited. Includes at least 2 different sources. No plagiarism!
Poor
Most sources are cited. Includes only 1 source. No plagiarism!
Incomplete
No sources are cited
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.