- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: WRT 120: This I Believe Podcast & Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
WRT 120: This I Believe Podcast & Paper WRT 120: This I Believe Podcast & Paper This essay should follow the guidelines provided by NPR's "This I Believe" Project and should adhere to the guidelines mentioned in class. Rubric Code: G236AAA By triggs621 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Podcast & Paper
	Excellent 14 pts	Good 11 pts	Poor 8 pts
Content - Paper	Excellent Major points are clearly stated and supported by well-thought out arguments. Content & purpose are clear.	Good There is an appropriate framework to the paper that is consistently supported. Content is minimally inconsistent with regard to purpose.	Poor Very little framework to the paper; support is lacking or is inaccurate. Unclear if writer understands their purpose or the assignment.
Development - Paper	Excellent Paper shows a high level of creativity, thought, and attention to detail.	Good Paper shows a moderate level of creativity, thought, and attention to detail.	Poor Paper presents presents little to no creativity, thought, or attention to detail.
Conventions - Paper	Excellent All grammatical and format conventions are correct.	Good There are minor errors in either grammatical or format conventions.	Poor This paper requires a rewrite.
Voice - Paper	Excellent Essay shows speaker's unique style and voice.	Good Essay reflects inconsistent representation of speaker's style.	Poor Essay shows a generic style.
Process	Excellent Student participates in the process of peer review.	Good Student BARELY participates in the process of peer review.	Poor Student does not participate in the peer review process.
Delivery - Podcast	Excellent Speaker's voice consistently shows interest and emotion to complement the written component.	Good Speaker's voice inconsistently shows interest and emotion to complement the written component.	Poor Speaker's voice is monotone and lacks any emotional connection to the material.
Format - Podcast	Excellent High quality audio &/or visual representation of the essay.	Good There are minor lapses in the product's quality.	Poor The podcast/video is of poor technical quality.