Skip to main content
iRubric: Team Presentation rubric

iRubric: Team Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Team Presentation 
The Presentation Team must present their research, as a team, to the class. Each member of the presentation team must speak. You will earn a grade that reflects the accuracy and detail of your research, and the quality of the presentation of your findings. Each student on the presentation team will earn a team collaboration grade. The team collaboration grade will be based on how effectively you perform your role as a member of the team.
Rubric Code: FXC886B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation Team
  Outstanding

5 pts

Proficient

4 pts

Emerging

3 pts

Basic

2 pts

Minimal Achievement

1 pts

Subject Knowledge
40 %

Outstanding

Specific, illustrative, supportive, and extensively developed detail, demonstrates a complete understanding of the various elements and their connection to the topic, provides clear explanation and elaboration, exceeds expectations
Proficient

Specific, supportive, and sufficiently developed detail, demonstrates a thorough understanding of the various elements and their connection to the topic of study, answers all questions with some elaboration, fully meets expectations
Emerging

Adequate detail, demonstrates an emerging understanding of the various elements and their connection to the topic of study, answers most questions but unable to elaborate; meets expectations
Basic

Limited, and partially developed detail, demonstrates partial understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study, appears uncomfortable with information, answers only most basic questions
Minimal Achievement

Underdeveloped, vague, confusing detail, demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study, demonstrates little understanding of subject, cannot answer questions about subject
Delivery
30 %

Outstanding

Enthusiastic tone, consistent volume, delivered at a natural speed. Every team member demonstrates commitment to extemporaneous delivery of the presentation. There is evidence of practice and consistency of presentation flow.
Proficient

Enthusiastic tone, appropriate volume, and speed of delivery are maintained. Every team member demonstrates proficient commitment to extemporaneous delivery of the presentation. There is evidence of practice and some consistency in presentation flow.
Emerging

Tone, volume, speed are appropriate. Some team members are presenting with more enthusiasm than others. Presentation could benefit from more consistent flow.
Basic

Tone, volume, speed are inconsistent. More practice is in order. There is little flow to the overall presentation.
Minimal Achievement

Tone, volume, speed are poor, the entire presentation is delivered with lack of attention to professionalism and flow.
Transitions | Functioning as a team
5 %

Outstanding

Excellent transitions between speakers. Every speaker is introduced effectively and efficiently.
Proficient
Emerging
Basic

Partially developed transitions. Most of the time we are wondering who the speaker is.
Minimal Achievement
Audio | Visual
15 %

Outstanding

Audio-visual elements are consistently superior, graphics are relevant and demonstrate a deep understanding of subject, superior graphics always consistent with text, creativity is evident. No grammatical errors, typing or spelling mistakes.
Proficient
Emerging

Emerging level of achievement with regard to audio-visual elements, graphics relevant, demonstrate a good understanding of subject, mostly consistent with text. Some grammatical, typing or spelling mistakes
Basic
Minimal Achievement

Basic level of achievement with regard to audio-visual elements, graphics relevant but somewhat inappropriate/basic, demonstrate satisfactory understanding of subject, graphics somewhat consistent with text. Abundant grammatical, spelling and typing mistakes.
Sources
10 %

Outstanding

Logical, sophisticated organization of content, exceptional depth and completely accurate factual information indicates extensive use of sources.
Sources are orally cited
Proficient

Proficient organization of content, excellent depth and accurate factual information indicates use of a variety of sources, most sources used effectively and properly cited, citations are varied
Emerging

Sufficient organization of content, sufficient and functional depth and accuracy of factual information indicates some use of sources beyond the minimum requirement, sources used effectively and some cited orally
Basic

Limited organization of content, partial development of factual detail, and/or superficial nature of depth indicates that a sufficient variety of sources were probably not used, citation formatting needs to be improved, most sources lack oral citations
Minimal Achievement

Distinct lack of organization, underdeveloped factual detail and insufficient depth indicate an inadequate attempt to use source material effectively, citations missing and not orally cited



Keywords:
  • Unit Guide | Presentation Team Evaluation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98