iRubric: Elements of Literature Google Slides Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Elements of Literature Google Slides Presentation Rubric

Seedfolks Keynote Oral Presentation Rubric

Rubric for evaluating content of presentation, student's delivery skills during oral presentation, and contributions to the group.

Rubric Code: DX9574A

By lrmcbride

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 6-8

Oral Presentation Rubric B
	Excellent Above Grade Level 5 pts	Very Good Meets Grade Level Standards 4 pts	Good Approaching Grade Level Standards 3 pts	Poor Below Grade Level Standards 2 pts	Needs Improvement Unacceptable 1 pts
Content	Excellent Student showed full and insightful understanding of the content he or she was covering. Information on slides was accurate and thorough.	Very Good Student showed full understanding of the content he or she was covering. Information on slides was accurate but may have been missing one or two details or examples.	Good Student showed basic understanding of the content he or she was covering. Information on slides was mostly accurate but was missing some key information or had some inaccurate information.	Poor Student attempted to show understanding of the content he or she was covering. Information on slides was missing several pieces of key information and/or inaccurate information.	Needs Improvement Student was unsure and confused about the content he or she was covering. Student may have failed to do what he or she was supposed to do.
Cooperation and Effort	Excellent Student was responsible in completing his or her share of the work load thoroughly and on time. Student was productive and cooperative and helped other group members so they could be successful too. Student did not get off task when working with the group.	Very Good Student was responsible in completing his or her share of the work load. Student was productive and cooperative. Student did not get off task when working with the group or got off task very little.	Good Student was responsible in completing his or her share of the work load, although he or she did get off task occasionally. Student was ready to present on time.	Poor Student was somewhat responsible in completing his or her share of the work load, but did need help from others in order to complete it. Student was not on task as much as he or she needed to be.	Needs Improvement Student was lacking responsibility in completing his or her share of the work load and needed significant help from others in order to complete it. Student was off task and/or uncooperative.
Visual Appeal of Keynote	Excellent Keynote is visually appealing, with pictures and/or graphics on all of the slides. Slides do not have too much nor too little text.	Very Good Keynote is mostly visually appealing. Slides mostly do not have too much nor too little text. There are pictures that enhance the presentation on most, or all, of the slides.	Good Keynote is somewhat visually appealing, but would be improved by more pictures or graphics. Some slides may have too much or too little text.	Poor Keynote isn't very visually appealing and would definitely be improved by more pictures or graphics. Slides often have too much or too little text.	Needs Improvement Student is missing some important slides and/or information. Keynote isn't visually appealing and would definitely be improved by more pictures or graphics. Slides have too much or too little text.
Conventions	Excellent There were no errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar on this student's slides.	Very Good There were a few minor errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar on this student's slides, but these did not detract from the presentation.	Good There were a noticeable number of errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar on this student's slides, and these detracted somewhat from the presentation.	Poor There were many errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar on this student's slides, and these detracted significantly from the presentation and other students' understanding of the information shared.	Needs Improvement There were so many errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar on this student's slides that other students could not understand and use the information shared without significant revision.
Posture and Eye Contact	Excellent Student stood up straight and looked relaxed and confident. He or she established eye contact with the audience during the presentation and either did not have to refer to iPad or did so very sparingly.	Very Good Student stood up straight. He or she established eye contact with the audience during the presentation and referred to iPad only occassionally.	Good Student either stood up straight or established eye contact with the audience during the presentation, but not both. Student relied noticeably on presentation notes on iPad.	Poor Student sometimes stood up straight and established eye contact but may have swayed or moved in somewhat distracting ways. Student relied heavily on presentation notes on iPad.	Needs Improvement Student slouched, swayed, and/or moved in distracting ways. He or she did not look at people during the presentation and read directly from notes on iPad.
Volume and Speed	Excellent Student spoke clearly and at a good volume and pace. All members of the audience could hear and understand during the whole presentation.	Very Good Student mostly spoke clearly and at a good volume and speed, but there were one or two moments when it was difficult to hear. Most members of the audience could hear and understand during 95% of the presentation.	Good Student mostly spoke clearly and at a good volume, but there were a few moments when it was difficult to hear. Audience could hear and understand during at least 85% of the presentation.	Poor Student mumbled, spoke quietly, or spoke too quickly. It was noticeable difficult to hear and understand during parts of the presentation about half of the time.	Needs Improvement It was very difficult to hear and understand the student during the presentation due to problems with volume and/or speed of delivery.
Verbal Delivery Grammar, Pronunciation, Verbal Idiosyncracies, Laughing, etc. (Poor presentation habits)	Excellent Student's grammar and vocabulary were appealing, and student did not engage in any distracting verbal idiosyncracies or laughter.	Very Good Student's grammar and vocabulary were grade appropriate, and student engaged in little to no distracting verbal idiosyncracies or laughter.	Good Student's grammar and vocabulary were basic, but not inappropriate. Student may have engaged in some noticeable verbal idiosyncracies or laughter (saying "um," or another word repeatedly.)	Poor Student's grammar and vocabulary detracted somewhat from the presentation, or student displayed multiple verbal indiosyncracies or bouts of laughter, but ideas were still able to be understood.	Needs Improvement Student's grammar, vocabulary, verbal idiosyncracies, or laughter made enjoyment and appreciation of the presentation nearly impossible.

Keywords:

Oral communication, Delivery techniques, Language

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric