iRubric: Oral Presentation Rubric - The Ripper

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Oral Presentation Rubric - The Ripper

Oral Presentation Rubric

Rubric Code: BX4233X

By BZPost

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Oral Presentation Rubric B
	Excellent 10 pts	Proficient 8 pts	Basic 6 pts	Below Basic 4 pts
Organization	Excellent -Specific introduction and conclusion -Sequenced material within the body -Cohesive presentation content	Proficient -Specific introduction and conclusion -Sequenced material within the body -Cohesive presentation content	Basic -Specific introduction and conclusion -Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent	Below Basic -Specific introduction and conclusion -No sequence in material
Language	Excellent -Correct grammar -Appropriate to audience -Creative and effective use of schemes and tropes	Proficient -Correct grammar -Appropriate to audience -Evident use of schemes and tropes	Basic -Correct grammar -Appropriate to audience -Attempts at use of schemes and tropes	Below Basic -Occasional mistakes in grammar -Appropriate to audience -Schemes and tropes not evident
Graphics	Excellent -Provide a concrete example of the argument -Encourage discussion -Enhance memory -Bibliography with annotations -Graphic from Synthesis Task	Proficient -Follows the argument -evidence of visuals -Visuals too sparse or too cluttered to enhance memory -Bibliography with annotations -Graphic from Synthesis Task	Basic -Whole excerpts of the argument are simply pasted into the visual -Confuse the audience or cause the audience to look away -Are incongruous to the argument	Below Basic -The entire argument is pasted into the presentation or no visuals present -Visuals are inappropriate for the audience or non-sequitur
Works Cited	Excellent Proper Format, All Sources	Proficient Proper Format, Some Sources	Basic Improper format, Some Sources	Below Basic No Sources cited appropriately
Content	Excellent -Argument is logical, detailed, well-researched, and evident of argumentative format with use of rhetorical strategies	Proficient -Argument is logical, researched and evident of argumentative format	Basic -Argument logic is faulty not fully researched	Below Basic -Argument logic is heavily flawed with no attention to research
Criteria	Excellent -Are developed with careful attention to detail	Proficient -Are adhered to and addressed	Basic -Are addressed somewhat	Below Basic -Are missing in entirety

Keywords:

Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric