Skip to main content

iRubric: Student Led Discussions rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Student Led Discussions 
Students LEAD a class discussion on a topic of interest
Rubric Code: AXA3962
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Student Led Discussions Rubric
  4

4 pts

3

3 pts

2

2 pts

1

1 pts

Preparation

4

Discussion is thoroughly organized with an article, warm-up, review, discussion protocol, and reflection. All aspects are well-timed and clear to the class. Many (6+) discussion questions are prepared in advance.
3

Discussion is organized with minor lapses in the necessary materials: an article, warm-up, review, discussion protocol, and reflection. Aspects are well-timed, and class has little issue with clarity. Discussion questions (4-5) are prepared in advance.
2

Discussion is somewhat organized with some lapses in the necessary materials. Aspects are not well-timed and there is class confusion at times. Discussion questions (1-3) are prepared in advance.
1

Discussion is not well organized and has major gaps in necessary materials. Class is confused often. Discussion questions are not prepared in advance.
Course/Professional Language

4

Use of course vocabulary occurs consistently and comfortably.
3

Use of course vocabulary occurs often, with minor lapses.
2

Use of professional vocabulary occurs at times, but not consistently.
1

Participation lacks course vocabulary &/or academic tone.
Critical Thinking

4

Participation consistently shows evidence of critical/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning, making connections to self, text, and the world.
3

Participation shows critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning most of the time, makes a few connections to self, text, and the world.
2

Participation shows minimal critical thinking/reflective thinking &/or ethical reasoning. Leaves out connections.
1

Participation lacks evidence of critical/reflective thinking or ethical reasoning. Minimal effort evidenced.
Leading Discussion

4

Participant encourages and motivates involvements of other students.
3

Initiates and responds to other student & instructor comments.
2

Occasionally responds to other students &/or instructor.
1

Does not continue participation in the discussion.



Keywords:
  • Opinion discussion lead presentation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224