Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Graded Recitation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Graded Recitation
Graded Recitation
Rubric for Recitation/Class Participation
Rubric Code:
A2433CB
By
Dale_02
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Recitation
Poor
4 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
ORIGINAL THOUGHT
Poor
Student only repeats what is in the textbook or other sources.
Fair
Student seldom brings original thought and perspective to discussion; will try to bring original thought by rewording text or notes material.
Good
Student sometimes brings original thought and perspective to discussion.
Excellent
Student often brings original thought and perspective to discussion. Shows great evidence of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of concepts and stimuli.
PREPARATION
Poor
Rarely reads or prepares advanced materials when assigned for small group/ in-class discussion. Rarely brings textbook or other resources when asked.
Fair
Usually reads or prepares materials in advance but usually not much beyond what is required. Usually brings textbook or other resources when asked.
Good
Always reads materials in advance when assigned for small group/in-class discussion. Always brings textbook or other resources when asked. Sometimes brings/ anticipates additional materials that may be of use.
Excellent
Always reads materials in advance. Always brings textbook or other resources when asked and often demonstrates understanding and contextualization of the material.
QUALITY OF COMMENTS
Poor
Responses are
uninformative, lacking in
appropriate terminology.
Heavy reliance on
opinion & personal taste,
e.g., “I love it”, “I hate it”,
“It’s bad” etc.
Fair
Responses are sometimes
constructive, with
occasional signs of
insight. Student does not
use appropriate
terminology; comments
not always relevant to
the discussion.
Good
Responses mostly
insightful & constructive;
mostly uses appropriate
terminology. Occasionally
comments are too
general or not relevant
to the discussion.
Excellent
Responses always
insightful & constructive;
uses appropriate
terminology. Comments
balanced between general
impressions, opinions &
specific, thoughtful
criticisms or contributions.
Keywords:
participation, discussion, arts and design
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Communication
English
Foreign Languages
Science
(General)
Types:
Attendance
Assessment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Attendance rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.