Skip to main content
iRubric: Natural Disasters project presentation rubric

iRubric: Natural Disasters project presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Natural Disasters project presentation 
Natural Disasters project presentation
Presentation on research done about a Natural Disaster. Could be a Google Slide, iMovie, Prezi, Thinglink, and could involve app mashing as well.
Rubric Code: YXAXXWA
By cposten
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Natural Disasters
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Minimal

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Very good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Title/Introduction.

Title, Names, Definition of disaster.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not complete task.
Minimal

Student did not introduce their topic well, slide did not have topic nor the presenters name on it.
Good

Student had a slide with topic and presenters name but missing the definition.
Very good

Student included the definition of the disaster.
Excellent

Excellent - captured audience and summarized content as well as gave definition of disaster.
The description of Disaster

General characteristics/ features of natural disaster.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not complete the task.
Minimal

Explanation was very brief.
Good

Explanation was not detailed enough and in support of the slides
Very good

Explanation was good and supported the slides.
Excellent

Explanation was excellent and supported the slides.
Most common places for it to happen

Where does this disaster occur. Including a Map.
Unsatisfactory

Student did no complete the task.
Minimal

Explanation was very brief. Map was not included.
Good

Explanation was not detailed. Map was included.
Very good

Explanation was good and supported the slide. Map included and explained.
Excellent

Explanation was excellent and supported the slide. Map was included and explained well.
Safety Precautions

What do humans do as precautions against disaster.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not complete the task.
Minimal

Explanation was very brief.
Good

Explanation was not detailed.
Very good

Explanation was good and supported.
Excellent

Explanation was excellent.
Warnings/predictions

Warnings regarding your disaster. Information regarding predictions.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not include this in presentation.
Minimal

Very few details in regards to warnings and predictions.
Good

Few details about warnings and predictions.
Very good

Explanation of warnings regarding the disaster as well as how it is predicted is good.
Excellent

Explanation of warnings regarding the disaster as well as how it is predicted is excellent.
Top 10 Most Damaging

In the World.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not complete the task.
Minimal

Explanation was very brief.
Good

Explanation was not detailed and in support of the slide.
Very good

Explanation was good and supported the slide.
Excellent

Explanation was excellent and supported the slide
Statistics

Injuries, deaths, structure damage.
Unsatisfactory

No statistics were included.
Minimal

Very few statistics.
Good

Statistics were few and not detailed.
Very good

A fair amount of statistics were included.
Excellent

Many types statistics were included.
Cost

Cost of damage in the last 3 years. Or Costs associated with a time frame.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not include this in their presentation.
Minimal

Very Few details supporting the cost associated with disaster in the last 3 years.
Good

Few details supporting the cost associated with disaster in the last 3 years.
Very good

Good explanation of the costs associated with disaster in the last 3 years.
Excellent

Excellent explanation of the costs associated with disaster in the last 3 years.
Presentation

Neatness, color, typed,
background,
Unsatisfactory

Presentation was not neat and was hard to read. Included no details, pictures, diagrams, maps, charts, videos.
Minimal

Presentation was neat but not easy to read. Included very few details, pictures, diagrams, maps, charts, videos.
Good

Presentation was neat, colorful and easy to read.Included few details, pictures, diagrams, maps, charts, videos.
Very good

Presentation was very good. Included details, pictures, diagrams, maps, charts, videos.
Excellent

Presentation was excellent. Included many details, pictures, diagrams, maps, charts, videos.
Delivery

Eye contact, voice, rehearsed, confident, team work
Unsatisfactory

Delivery was poor. Statements were unclear.
Minimal

Delivery was lacking. Not all statements were clear.
Good

Delivery was limited. Most statements were clear but not in own words.
Very good

Delivery was good. Statements were clear and some in own words.
Excellent

Delivery was excellent. Statements were clear and in own words.



Keywords:
  • Project



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16