Skip to main content
iRubric: Critically appraised topic in OT rubric

iRubric: Critically appraised topic in OT rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Critically appraised topic in OT 
A critical review requires you to critique the literature. This type of critical appraisal, of the scholarly literature, requires that you demonstrate an understanding of diverse methods, research analysis, and the ability to synthesize and draw one's own conclusions for implications for practice. It is crucial for learners to be able to distinguish the "best" evidence from flawed research studies.
Rubric Code: TX76C42
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Critical Appraisal Rubric
  Minimally Fulfilled

1 pts

Partially Fulfilled

2 pts

Mostly Fulfilled

3 pts

Fully Fulfilled

4 pts

Study Purpose

Provides a brief background of the question to include the population, condition, and intervention/assessment/policy of interest.

Minimally Fulfilled

Minimally addresses some of the required elements.

Scenario states and identifies the main problem/issue but does not adequately explain why or how it is a problem.
Partially Fulfilled

Minimally addresses all of the required elements.

Identifies the main problem/issue and subsidiary aspects of the question.

Articulates an understanding of the scope of the problem and the related issues involved.
Mostly Fulfilled

Addresses all of the required elements.

Scenario identifies the main problem/issue and subsidiary aspects of the question.

Articulates an understanding of the scope of the problem and the related issues involved.
Fully Fulfilled

Addresses all of the required elements with considerable effectiveness and clarity.

Scenario articulates the scope of the problem and associated issues.

Identifies multiple embedded or implicit issues, and addresses their relations to the main problem.
Literature Review

Contains the justification for the need of the CAT question. Learner reports a critical evaluation of the evidence presented in the articles and includes clinical judgment on if sufficient evidence was presented to answer the clinical question. In addition, the learner discusses the possible clinical implications of the study.

Minimally Fulfilled

Minimally addresses ONE of the required elements
Partially Fulfilled

Minimally addresses all of the required elements
Mostly Fulfilled

Addresses all of the required elements in a clearly articulated manner.
Fully Fulfilled

Addresses all of the required elements in a clearly articulated manner AND articulates a response to the clinical question as supported by the literature review.
Interpretation of Results

Demonstrates ability to integrate research into high quality practice recommendations based on best available evidence.

Minimally Fulfilled

Conclusions are drawn and recommendations are provided, but without discussion of implications or consequences.
Partially Fulfilled

Conclusions and recommendations are stated and discussed.

Implications and consequences of the conclusion are reflected in context, relative to assumptions, and supporting evidence.
Mostly Fulfilled

Stated recommendations are based on a thorough examination of evidence, a clear explanation of reasonable alternatives, or an evaluation of possible consequences.

Conclusions and recommendations are reasonable given the strength of evidence reviewed.

Both clinical and statistical significance of the findings are discussed.
Fully Fulfilled

Stated recommendations are based on a thorough examination of evidence, a clear explanation of reasonable alternatives, and an evaluation of possible consequences.

Conclusions and recommendations are congruent with the strength of evidence reviewed, and an appropriate interpretation of both clinical and statistical significance of the findings.
Overall Critical Appraisal

Demonstrates ability to appraise and synthesize the research literature. Learner communicates methodological quality of studies reviewed and describes why a study is of high of low quality based on DYC Critical Appraisal Guidelines.

Minimally Fulfilled

Captures mostly appropriate evidence but does not consistently apply relevant thinking (e.g. discussing limitations, analyzing, summarizing) in presenting the various evidence.
Partially Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking some of the time specifically 1) accurately identifying aspects from the literature but does not adequately analyze or summarize the main themes or limitations; 2) completed but did not integrate the findings from the results ; 3) can identify elements of clinical relevance, yet the response is limited.
Mostly Fulfilled

Applies critical appraisal skills with considerable effectiveness.

Briefly acknowledges research limitations.

Demonstrates considerable knowledge of concepts, technical terminology and procedures as they relate to clinical practice.
Fully Fulfilled

Applies critical appraisal skills with a high degree of effectiveness.

Effectively discuss issues relating to research limitations.

Demonstrates a thorough knowledge of concepts, technical terminology and procedures as they relate to clinical practice.
Written product quality

Written product quality (organization, quality of content, clarity, concise and well-edited, appropriate citations), APA style, within page limit.

Minimally Fulfilled

Writing generally follows the grammatical and spelling conventions of standard English

Minimal adherence to APA style.
Partially Fulfilled

Writing follows the grammatical and spelling conventions of standard English.

Diction is formal, avoiding “I” and “we,” slang, and contractions.

Partial adherence to APA style.
Mostly Fulfilled

Sentences are generally grammatically correct; ideas
are readily understood but show signs of
disorganization; some transitions between concepts are
missing; there are occasional misspellings, especially with homonyms not detected with spelling checks.

General adherence to APA style.
Fully Fulfilled

Learner uses complex, grammatically correct sentences on a regular basis; expresses ideas clearly, concisely,
cogently, in logical fashion; uses words that demonstrate a high level of vocabulary; has rare misspellings.

Full adherence to APA style.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98