- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ESL Role Play Performance Test Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ESL Role Play Performance Test Rubric ESL Role Play Performance Test Rubric Assessment of Speaking Test Role Play (Level 2. Secondary Education. Spain. Sample) Rubric Code: PXAA564 By PalomaPoppies Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

Restaurant Role-play
	Beginner 0 pts	Developer 1 pts	Achiever 3 pts	Master 5 pts
Clarity	Beginner Speech was awkward and incomprehensible at all times.	Developer Speech was awkward and incomprehensible to understand some of the time.	Achiever Speech was awkward at times but always understandable.	Master Speech was clear and comprehensible at all times.
Pronunciation	Beginner Student's pronunciation was incomprehensible.	Developer Student's pronunciation made understanding difficult.	Achiever Student's pronunciation was understandable with some error.	Master Student's pronunciation was like a native speaker.
Fluency	Beginner Student was unable to speak during the role play.	Developer Student showed great difficulty in performing the role play, but was able to complete the task.	Achiever Students was able to perform the role play with little difficulty.	Master Students were able to perform the role play clearly with no difficulty.
Comprehension	Beginner Student was unable to follow cues, requiring a lot of repetition and help from partner/teacher.	Developer The student was able to follow cues but needed some help from their partner/teacher.	Achiever The student understood the cues and responses required of her almost all the time. Able to self-correct.	Master The student fully understood the cues and responses required for the role play.
Tone and Intonation	Beginner Student lacked tone and intonation completely. Speech was robotic and monotonous, showing no emotion or inflection at all.	Developer Student showed little change in tone and intonation. Speech was slightly robotic, showing very little emotion or inflection.	Achiever Student showed good use of tone and intonation, however, the tone or intonation was inappropriate for the context at times.	Master Student showed excellent use of tone and intonation. Both tone and intonation were appropriate for the context of the role play.
Content	Beginner Role play was disjointed in content. No target language, adjectives or prices were used.	Developer Role play was slightly disjointed in content. Some, but not much target language, including adjectives and prices.	Achiever Role play was cohesive: good use of target language. Minor deficiencies of adjectives and prices.	Master Role play was cohesive and contained all the necessary elements, including target language, adjectives and prices.