Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Literary Analysis of a Cretaion Myth rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Literary Analysis of a Cretaion Myth
Analysis of Short story
Short Story Presentation that evaluates the following areas: 1. Understanding of Plot 2. Using evidence to support a claim3. Analyzing author's use of literary devices in a work. 4. The quality of the presentation/poster used in the assignment. 5. The ability to evaluate if a story serves the purpose intended. 7. The ability of the student to work in a group.
Rubric Code:
LX243AC
By
Kolani
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Short Story Presentation
Excellent
10 pts
Good
8.5 pts
Fair
7 pts
Poor
5 pts
Focus of Plot Summary
Excellent
Student gave a detailed drawing of the plot line, and provided examples of the five major elements including the setting and major characters, rising action, conflict, falling action, and resolution
Good
Student gave a detailed drawing of the plot line, and provided examples elements including the setting and major characters, rising action, conflict, falling action, and resolution although some may be missing
Fair
Student gave a brief summary of the plot listing examples but failed to draw the plot line and incorporate enough details to summarize the story
Poor
The student description of the plot lacked sufficient details to support student's understanding of the story.
Compare and Contrast
Excellent
Student analyzed the work and and created a Venn diagram to compare and contrast with a similar work. The diagram contained three major details in each section.
Good
Student analyzed the work and and created a Venn diagram to compare and contrast with a similar work. The diagram contained examples in each section of the diagram but failed minimum number requirements.
Fair
Student wrote a description that compared the literary work with the work of another. The students provided some details to demonstrate understanding of the task but may have failed to both compared and contrast.
Poor
Student did not compare and contrast the story with another similar work.
Analysis of Literary Techniques
Excellent
Student identified one literary device in the story and demonstrated exceptional understanding as to how it was tied into theme
Good
Student identified one literary technique in the story and demonstated comprehension of its use in the story.
Fair
Student identified one literary technique in the story but did not demonstrate deep comprehension of its use in the story
Poor
Student could not identify one literary techniques in the story
Quality of Powerpoint/Visual Aids
Excellent
Student's visual aides were excellent and clearly demonstrated mastery of the assignment
Good
Student used visual aides that showed a good understanding of the work and the concepts involved in the work.
Fair
Student used visual aides to enhance the presentation, but could have developed them more.
Poor
Student used visual aides to enhance the presentation, but the presentations were lacking in depth and understanding.
Evaluation and Evidence
Excellent
The presentation provides strong textual evidence to support the arguement. All of the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's position
Good
Most of the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's position
Fair
At least one of the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's position
Poor
Evidence and examples are NOT relevant AND/OR not explained
Grammar & Usage
Excellent
Very few to no grammar or punctuation errors.
Good
Minor grammar or punctuation errors.
Fair
Errors in grammar or punctuation detracted from presentation.
Poor
Numerous errors in grammar and punctuation.
Subjects:
English
Foreign Languages
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.