- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Scholarship rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Scholarship Scholarship Evaluation of scholarship applicants Rubric Code: L52768 By mjbarnhart Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Category
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts	Above Average 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Essay	Poor no essay	Fair Poor quality writing Content not supportive of essay requirements	Good Fair quality writing Content complete but unremarkable	Above Average Above average quality writing Content complete Content interesting and descriptive	Excellent Excellent quality writing Content complete Content interesting, descriptive, imaginative and compelling
Apperance	Poor	Fair Not attired professionaly "not neatly dressed or clean"	Good Clean and neat attire	Above Average Dressed professionaly	Excellent
Recommendation Letters	Poor less than 2 letters	Fair Letters show unremarkable support of candidate Letters show no indication of why student specifically stands out for the PIHT Scholarship Letters do not indicate in-depth knowledge of candidate	Good Letters show support of candidate Letters mention the spirit of the PIHT Scholarship but do not expand on its effect on candidate Letters show understanding of candidate One letter is really good but the other is weak, possibly a form letter	Above Average Letters show enthusiastic support of candidate Letters mention significant impact of PIHT's philosophy of hard work and dedication on candidate Letters reflect in-depth understanding of candidate This option should be used only if both teacher and coach letters are excellent and pertinent	Excellent This option should be used only if both reference letters are excellent and pertinent
Community Involvement	Poor None, with no extenuating circumstances	Fair 1 or more examples of community involvement with no unique or leadership roles	Good 2 or more examples of community involvement with leadership roles	Above Average Recent and above average community service Leadership and extended roles in community service	Excellent
Interview	Poor Not able to answer the panels questions	Fair Answers the panels questions with difficulty	Good Answers the panels questions with thought, appropriate language, but with minimal difficulty	Above Average Answers the panels questions thoughtfully, thouroughly ,with proper language and without hesitation	Excellent