iRubric: APA Style Research Paper Rubric

The content in MOST (>75%) of the components of the research paper is lacks theoretical/ empirical. Research methods are not justified and there lack of coherence of information arguments presented from research problem/question to conclusion.

The content in SOME (50-75%) of the components of the research paper is supported by either theoretical/ research literature, sound methods or by empirical evidence. There is a chain of arguments is evident from research problem/question to conclusion.

The content in MOST (>75%) components of the research paper is supported by either theoretical/ research literature, sound methods or by empirical evidence. A coherent chain of arguments is evident from research problem/question to conclusion.

The content in ALL components of the research paper is well-supported by either theoretical/ research literature, sound methods or by empirical evidence. A coherent chain of arguments is highly evident from research problem/question to conclusion.

Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Language uses undefined jargon, or conversational tone.

Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

Language lacks clarity or includes the use of undefined jargon, or conversational tone.

Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.

Elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are included.

Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

Weak introduction of the research topic, rationalization of the research problem, Poorly organized, no logical sequence.

Adequate introduction of the research topic, rationalization of the research problem is supported by both literature and contextual realities, Leads to the statement of the problem. Identifies some themes. Builds an argument for the study.

Proficient introduction of the research topic; rationalization of the research problem is supported by both literature and contextual realities; Leads to the statement of the problem. Identifies major themes and how they fit together. Builds an argument for the study.

Exceptional introduction of the research topic that grabs readers' interest; well-supported rationalization of the research problem by both literature and contextual realities; Clearly leads to the statement of the problem. Functions like a “mini literature review." Identifies the broad themes that will be the focus of dissertation, and how they relate together. Major works cited but not the specifics. Describes general trends and begins to build an argument for the study.

Disorganized and/or cites 10 or fewer studies

Cites less than 15 studies.

Generally moves from broad to specific, but cites less than 20 studies.

Moves from the broad to the specific, funneling ideas. Begins with the multiple general categories that define study and moves towards studies that more specifically address the nature of research question(s). The final studies cited most closely resemble the project.