iRubric: Article Reaction Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Article Reaction Paper Article and Discussion The objective of this assignment is to generate critical thinking related to the integration of art in the elementary classroom. Read the article and provide a quick overview of the article's main points, then address one or all of the following questions. 1. How does the information presented impact students? 2. How might the information affect you as a teacher? 3. What does this mean for teaching? Positive or negative change to the field? Rubric Code: XXCB453 By DarlaHassler Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

EDUC 248 Reaction Papers
	Excellent 2.5 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1.75 pts	Poor 0 pts
Format	Excellent Followed the directions provided for this assignment.	Good Followed most of the direction provided for this assignment.	Fair Paper barely followed the directions provided for the assignment.	Poor Did not follow the directions provided for the assignment.
Summary	Excellent Thoroughly summarized the main points of the article.	Good Summarized most of the main points of the article	Fair Vague summary of the article.	Poor Did not summarize the article.
Discussion	Excellent Provided excellent discussion with important main points highlighted that addresses all 3 questions.	Good Provided good discussion with many of the main points highlighted and addressed 1 or 2 of the questions.	Fair Discussion lacked many of the main points and addresses one of the questions.	Poor Weak discussion, no main points extracted and none of the questions answered
Conventions/Mechanics	Excellent Effectively and correctly used complete and complex sentences, correct grammar, correct punctuation, correct spelling, and citing throughout the entire paper.	Good Correctly used complete and complex sentences, correct grammar, correct punctuation, correct spelling, and citing most of the time.	Fair Missing many, but not all of the conventions.	Poor Lacked most the conventions making the paper difficult to read/understand.