Skip to main content
iRubric: History PowerPoint Presentation rubric

iRubric: History PowerPoint Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
History PowerPoint Presentation 
History PowerPoint Presentation
Students choose a topic, follow the research process and create a multimedia presentation.
Rubric Code: Q223WX7
By tmessier30
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Aspects
100 %
  Exceptional

10 pts

Excellent

9 pts

Good

8 pts

Satisfactory

7 pts

Poor

6 pts

Unacceptable

5 pts

Knowledge of Material Assigned
20 %

Exceptional

Presentation shows group or individual read and understood the assigned material well enough to thoroughly teach about it.
Excellent

Presentation shows group or individual read and understood the assigned material well enough to thoroughly teach about it.
Good

Presentation shows group read and understood the chapter enough to teach about it.
Satisfactory

Presentation shows group read and showed basic understanding.
Poor

Presentation shows group skimmed the chapter and did not expand on basic facts.
Unacceptable

Presentation shows a skimming of the chapter missing the main topics.
PowerPoint
15 %

Technology
Exceptional

PowerPoint (PP) is very engaging, entertainingand exciting. It is well written with liberal use of photographs to enhance the information presented. Background enhances the presentation.
Excellent

PowerPoint (PP) is engaging and entertaining. It is reasonably well written with use of photographs to enhance the information presented. Background is appropiate for the presentation.
Good

PowerPoint (PP) is somewhat engaging and entertaining. Photographs are used to somewhat enhance the information presented. Background is adequate for the presentation.
Satisfactory

PowerPoint (PP) is utilitarian. There are photographs used but are ineffectual or there is no photographs used. Background is adequate for the presentation.
Poor

PowerPoint (PP) is adequate. Photographs, if any, are inappropriate or ineffectual and detract from the information presented. Background detracts from the presentation.
Unacceptable

PowerPoint (PP) is inadequate. Photographs, if any, are inappropriate or ineffectual and detract from the information presented. Background is inappropriate for the presentation.
Organization
15 %

Structure of the PowerPoint
Exceptional

Content is written clearly and concisely with a logical sequence of ideas and supporting information. Very limited number of bullets per page. The amount of verbiage per bullet point is to the point and brief.
The presentation gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Excellent

Content is written with a logical sequence of ideas and supporting information. Limited number of bullets per page. The amount of verbiage per bullet point is to the point.
Most of the presentation gives the audience an idea of the topic.
Good

The content is vague in certain aspects or missing them all together. Main points may be lost to the audience.
Includes few facts. Some of the information may not seem to fit.
Satisfactory

Sequencing of ideas is unclear. Includes little information - few facts from each topic. Excessive number of bullets per page. >
Information is incomplete or incorrect.
Poor

Too many or too few bullets per page with too much information per bullets. Information is incomplete.
Few facts are present in general. The main ideas are difficult to ascertain or non evident.
Unacceptable

Students did not present the correct content. Too many or too few bullets per page with too much information per bullets. It is difficult to learn any of the historical information assigned from the presentation.
Oral Presentation
15 %

Exceptional

Well structured sentences and ideas used.
Poised, clear articulation; proper volume and rate; eye contact.
Involved the audience in the presentation; points made in creative way.
Every group member speaks frequently.
Excellent

Well structured sentences and ideas used.
Poised, clear articulation; proper volume and rate; eye contact.
Involved the audience in the presentation; points made in creative way.
Every group member speaks frequently.
Good

Well structured sentences and ideas used most of time.
Some mumbling; some eye contact; uneven rate; little expression. Held the audience's attention most of the time. Every group member speaks.
Satisfactory

Few well structured sentences used.
Inaudible or too loud; no eye contact; rate too slow/fast.
Lost the audience's interest; mostly presented facts with little or no imagination. Most group members speak.
Poor

Poor sentence structure used.
Unprepared and unrehearsed oral expositions are given. Volume and/or rate may be off. Speakers fail to engage the audience. Only one or two group members speak.
Unacceptable

One group member talked the whole time and did a poor job at engaging the class.
Historical Accuracy
15 %

Exceptional

Virtually error-free; minor mistakes do not compromise argument.
Excellent

There are historical errors minor in nature which do not compromise argument
Good

Includes errors; errors insignificantly compromise argument.
Satisfactory

General, largely accurate data, but contains major errors or misstatements.
Poor

Writing has extremely high error rate; totally unsubstantiated by historical fact.
Unacceptable

Extremely inaccurate
Primary Sources
10 %

Exceptional

You have included 3 meaningful/academic sources (1 primary) to support the content. Credits are included.
Excellent

You have included 3 meaningful/academic sources to support the content. Credits are included.
Good

You have included 2 meaningful/academic sources to support your content. They are relevant. Credits are included.
Satisfactory

You have included 1 to 2 somewhat relevant/academic sources to support your content. They may not enhance the understanding of the content.
Poor

Poor usage of sources. They do little or nothing to enhance the content.
Unacceptable

No academic sources were used.
Works Cited
10 %

Exceptional

Sources of information/photos are properly cited so that the audience can determine the credibility and authority of the information presented.
All sources of information are clearly identified and credited in MLA format.
Excellent

Sources of information/photos are properly cited so that the audience can determine the credibility and authority of the information presented.
All sources of information are clearly identified and credited in MLA format.
Good

Most sources of information/photos are documented to make it possible to check on the accuracy of information. MLA format used.
Satisfactory

Multiple formatting issues or errors. Not MLA format or missing major pieces.
Poor

Only the textbook was cited.
Unacceptable

No Works Cited page



Keywords:
  • powerpoint multimedia



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16