iRubric: Endangered Ecosystems Debate rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Endangered Ecosystems Debate

This rubric is to evaluate the students individually and in their groups. This project was to recognize the human impact on the environment and take responsibility in become environmentally aware. As the research continued, the students prepared for not only a presentation, but a final debate as well. The students then wrote a reflection to decide the importance of compatibility and compromise in working together to preserve the environment and why.

Rubric Code: ZXX6724

By amrichards73

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Project Rubric
	1 1 pts	2 2 pts	3 3 pts	4 4 pts
Research	1 -The student has little to no evidence of research.<BR> -The student did not use research time efficiently.<BR> -The student does not show any knowledge of the candidate's plans.	2 -The student has little evidence of research.<BR> -The student did not use research time completely efficiently.<BR> -The student shows little knowledge of the candidate's plans.	3 -The student has evidence of research.<BR> -The student used research time completely efficiently.<BR> -The student shows knowledge of the candidate's plans.	4 -The student has evidence of research and proof of further research.<BR> -The student used research time completely efficiently.<BR> -The student shows full knowledge of the candidate's plans.
Debate	1 -The student did not participate in the debate at all.<BR> -The student did not come with debate notes.	2 -The student barely participated in the debate.<BR> -The student's debate notes were not thorough.	3 -The student actively participated in the debate.<BR> -The student's debate notes were completely thorough.	4 -The student actively participated in the debate and brought up interetsing new ideas.<BR> -The student's debate notes were exceedingly thorough.
Reflection	1 -The student did not complete his or her reflection.	2 -The student's reflection is minimal, and does not show an actual reflection.	3 -The student completed the reflection and gave factual support as to why they agree each plan.	4 -The student completed the reflection thoroughly and gave factual support as to why they agree each plan.