Skip to main content
iRubric: AP Analytical Writing rubric

iRubric: AP Analytical Writing rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP Analytical Writing 
AP Analytical Writing
This rubric aids in grading a thesis-driven analytical essay on CITR
Rubric Code: YXAW646
By liceoingles
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric AP Analytical Writing
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Claim/Position/Thesis

Poor

Thesis is vague, unclear, and unpersuasive.
Fair

Thesis is specific, debatable, and provable, but not complex and/or is awkwardly expressed.
Good

Thesis is specific, debatable, provable, and complex. It is clear and readable.
Excellent

Thesis is specific, debatable, provable, complex, and original. It is clear, concise, and insightful.
STRUCTURE
introduction

Poor

The introduction is unfocused and does not include author or title.
Fair

There is a clear introduction that includes author and title.
Good

The introduction leads into the thesis and provides information necessary for understanding why the writer will make this particular argument.<BR>
-Includes author and title.
Excellent

-The introduction "hooks" the reader and leads clearly into the thesis, providing all the necessary information to explain why the writer will make this particular argument.<BR>
-Includes author and title (italicized).
organization

Poor

-It is difficult to understand the argument because it lacks a clear organizational structure.<BR>
-No topic sentences or transitions<BR>
-Paragraphs are unfocused and poorly structured
Fair

-Paragraphs are arranged with no clear order.<BR>
-Some paragraphs lack topic sentences.<BR>
-Poor or awkward transitions.<BR>
-Some paragraphs lack clear focus.
Good

-Paragraphs are set up in a logical order, with transitions.<BR>
-Paragraphs begin with clear topic sentences.<BR>
-Paragraphs focus only on one idea.
Excellent

-Paragraphs build from smaller to larger claims in a logical order, joined by effective transitions.<BR>
-Paragraphs begin with effective topic sentences (specific, provable, debatable).<BR>
-Paragraphs focus only on one idea.
conclusion

Poor

Conclusion provides incomplete summary
Fair

Conclusion summarizes argument
Good

Conclusion summarizes argument and is moderately successful in pushing thesis in a new direction
Excellent

Conclusion draws together main points of the argument and extends the thesis to further consider its implications for understanding the novel as a whole
SUPPORT
textual evidence

Poor

-Does not provide quotes in every paragraph<BR>
-Quotes are not relevant to the thesis.<BR>
-Quotes are not introduced.
Fair

-Provides quotes in every paragraph, but some may not be relevant to the thesis<BR>
-Quotes are drawn from only limited parts of the text.<BR>
-Quotes are not introduced effectively with no attempts at integration.
Good

-Provides quotes in every paragraph that support the central claims of the thesis<BR>
-Quotes come from different parts of the text.<BR>
-Quotes are introduced effectively with some integration into the writer's prose.
Excellent

-Provides support for the argument by offering effective and appropriate quotes in every paragraph<BR>
-Quotes are drawn from different parts of the text to demonstrate an understanding of the novel as a whole.<BR>
-Quotes are introduced effectively and integrated well into the writer's prose.
analysis

Poor

Quotes simply appear without explanation or analysis.
Fair

Quotes are explained in a general way, but with no reference to specific language or details.
Good

Evidence is paraphrased analyzed and explained in some detail to show relevance to the writer's argument.
Excellent

Evidence is a combination of paraphrase and direct quotes that focust upon specific language within quotes is analyzed thoroughly and explained clearly to show relevance to the writer's argument.
STYLE & MECHANICS
style

Poor

-Simple vocabulary<BR>
-No sentence variety<BR>
-Inappropriate stylistic choices
Fair

-Simple vocabulary<BR>
-little sentence variety<BR>
-Overuse of contractions or vague pronouns<BR>
-Some errors in sentence structure
Good

-Effective use of vocabulary <BR>
-Moderately successful in varying sentence structure<BR>
-Minor flaws in usage of contractions or vague pronouns
Excellent

-Rich, effective use of vocabulary <BR>
-Uses a variety of long and short sentences<BR>
-No use of contractions or vague pronouns<BR>
-Sentences are clear and structured effectively.
mechanics

Poor

-Does not cite at all<BR>
-Enough errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar to be distracting to readers
Fair

-Does not cite or cites completely incorrectly<BR>
-Enough errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar to be noticeable
Good

-Only cites some of the time or citations are only partially correct -Several minor errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar
Excellent

-Cites correctly<BR>
-Free from errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar



Keywords:
  • thesis, expository essay, textual analysis

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16