iRubric: Mid-Term: French rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mid-Term: French

Spanish Conversation & Pronunciation Rubric

Intermediate Conversation & Pronunciation Rubric Assesment

Rubric Code: YX29X6C

By atsanti

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Exam

Grade Levels: 6-8

French Conversation Conversation & Pronunciation
	Poor (50-59) 1 pts	Fair (60-69) 2 pts	Good (70-79) 3 pts	Excellent (80-89) 4 pts	Exemplary (90-100) 5 pts
Clarity 5 pts	Poor (50-59) All answers were awkward and incomprehensible.	Fair (60-69) Answers were awkward and incomprehensible to understand at times.	Good (70-79) Answers were awkward at times but always understandable.	Excellent (80-89) Answers were clear and comprehensible.	Exemplary (90-100) Answers were comprehensible, varied, and natural.
Voice/Non-verbal Communication 5 pts	Poor (50-59) Pronunciation, inflection, and/or expression confused communication. Student may have been very difficult to hear.	Fair (60-69) Some communication problems arose due to unclear pronunciation and/or lack of inflection and/or expression. Student may have been difficult to hear.	Good (70-79) No serious problems arose, but better pronunciation, inflection, and/or non-verbal communication could have made communication more efficient.	Excellent (80-89) Pronunciation was clear and inflection and expressions were used to enhance communication.	Exemplary (90-100) Pronunciation was clear. Gestures, body language, inflection, and expressions were used to enhance communication.
Fluency 5 pts	Poor (50-59) Much effort was required to maintain the conversation. There may have been many long pauses OR there were too many errors to understand the speaker.	Fair (60-69) Some effort was required to maintain the conversation. There may have been a few long pauses OR several important errors.	Good (70-79) Some minor difficulties maintaining the conversation were evident. Errors did not prevent the speaker from being understood.	Excellent (80-89) Student acted as a facilitator, helping the conversation flow and develop. There were some minor errors.	Exemplary (90-100) Student was independent and initiated conversation, bringing up new topics in addition to going with the flow. There were very few errors.
Comprehension 5 pts	Poor (50-59) Student was unable to comprehend questions. Even with prompting, questions could not be understood.	Fair (60-69) The student showed little comprehension of questions. Questions had to be repeated. Prompting was required.	Good (70-79) The student understood most of what was asked of him/her.	Excellent (80-89) The student fully understood the questions asked and answered correctly.	Exemplary (90-100) The student fully understood the questions asked and answered beyond expectation, bringing up new topics and follow-up questions.
Content 5 pts	Poor (50-59) No response to question.	Fair (60-69) Answered question with very limited answers.	Good (70-79) Gave appropriate responses but responses were limited in content.	Excellent (80-89) Presented good content in response to questions. Student also presented questions of his/her own.	Exemplary (90-100) The student presented questions and responses were detailed. Student used a variety of vocabulary and grammar points to express ideas.

Keywords:

French Midterm Conversation Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Exam
Project

Discuss this rubric