iRubric: Group Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Presentation Rubric

This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.

Rubric Code: YBXA4X

By ndevereaux

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Group Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	No Evidence 0 pts
Organization	Excellent Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.	Good Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.	Fair Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.	Poor Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Teamwork/Participation	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.	Good The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members participated slightly more than others.	Fair Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.	Poor Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Visual Aid(s)	Excellent Visual aids used were used effectively throughout presentation. Group members used visual aids as a supplement, not as a crutch.	Good Visual aids used were somewhat effective, but weren't used consistently thoughout presentation.	Fair Visual aids used did not support verbal presentation. They lacked information, or groups members read from them.	Poor Visual aids were not used at all.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Followed Plan	Excellent Presentation followed greater than 85% of plan prepared in advance .	Good Presentation followed 71% - 85% of plan prepared in advance .	Fair followed 41% - 70% of plan prepared in	Poor Presentation followed 0% - 40% of plan prepared in advance.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Content History	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Content How it works?	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Content How do we harness it?	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Content How does it impact the environment?	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Individual Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	No Evidence 0 pts
Voice	Excellent Consistent and effective volume, articulation, and expression were present in the speaker's voice. Appropriate rate and pausing were employed.	Good The student spoke loudly and clearly enough to be easily understood. The speaker used adequate expression and rate.	Fair The student could be heard most of the time but at certain points was inaudible. Little expression was shown.	Poor Audience had difficulty hearing and/or understanding much of the speech due to low volume. Very little expression was shown.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Eye Contact	Excellent The speaker looked at all of the audience most of the time.	Good The speaker looked at much of the audience often.	Fair The speaker looked up occasionally and focused on only a few people during the speech.	Poor The speaker seldom looked at the audience.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown
Posture	Excellent The speaker maintained good posture. Movements were purposeful and enhanced the delivery of the speech. Facial expressions were comfortable and showed enthusiasm for the topic.	Good The speaker maintained adequate posture and non-distracting movement during the speech. Expressions were comfortable.	Fair The speaker had some distracting movement during delivery. Facial expressions seemed forced or absent.	Poor The speaker's posture and expression indicated a lack of enthusiasm or comfortableness with the speech. Some movements were very distracting and made the speech difficult to follow.	No Evidence No Evidence Shown

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric