- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Newspaper Article rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Newspaper Article Timeline Poster Students will write a newspaper article about the era being studied. In the end, the student must submit a reflection. Rubric Code: Y22BBWX By MsRobertsEO Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5, 9-12

Timeline
	Exemplary 10 pts	Accomplished 7 pts	Developing 4 pts	Beginning 1 pts
Headline	Exemplary Article has a headline that captures the reader's attention and accurately describes the content.	Accomplished Article has a headline that accurately describes the content.	Developing Article has a headline that does not describe the content.	Beginning Article is missing a headline.
Supporting Details	Exemplary The details in the article are clear and supportive of the topic.	Accomplished The details in the article are clear but need to be developed more. Some details may not fit in with the topic.	Developing Most details in the article are clear. Article does not focus on the topic well.	Beginning The details article are neither clear nor related to the topic.
Who, What, When, Where and How	Exemplary Article adequately addresses the five W's (who, what, when, where and how).	Accomplished The article is missing one of the five W's.	Developing The article is missing two of the 5 W's.	Beginning The article is missing three or more of the five W's.
Presentation & Quality	Exemplary Impressive article. Student ties the theme nicely into the article and allows the reader to be fully immersed in the story. Well written and concise.	Accomplished Some extra effort noticed. Article was well written and tied to the theme.	Developing Article reflects a lack of effort. Not engaging or interesting.	Beginning A clear lack of effort throughout. Far below the average timeline. Difficult to read and understand due to the amount of grammatical/spelling errors.
Reflection	Exemplary Reflection fully explains why you designed your product in the way that you did and justifies/defends the “justifiable manipulation” of your product.	Accomplished Reflection moderately explains why you designed your product in the way that you did and justifies/defends the “justifiable manipulation” of your product.	Developing Reflection poorly explains why you designed your product in the way that you did and justifies/defends the “justifiable manipulation” of your product.	Beginning Reflection only explains why you designed your product in the way that you did OR justified/defends the “justifiable manipulation” of your product.