Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Researched Argument Paper - MLA FORMAT rubric

iRubric: Researched Argument Paper - MLA FORMAT rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Researched Argument Paper - MLA FORMAT Researched Argument Paper - MLA FORMAT Research Based Argumentative essay, Counter Argument & Refutation, MLA paper format, and MLA documentation dks Rubric Code: XXB7CX4 By radigunde Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Argumentative Essay
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)	Unacceptable (N/A)
Content 20 % the extent to which the essay conveys complete ideas and information clearly and accurately supports in an analysis of the texts	Excellent -precise claims -Body supports thesis -Good transitions, -Conclusion - strong. -in-depth and insightful analysis	Good -clear thesis; -body -some support; -fair transitions -conclusion - fair -thorough analysis	Fair Unclear thesis, or Body gives very little support to thesis ; or poor transitions, or conclusion is lacking or confused analysis	Poor No thesis; body has no organization.conclusion; no connection to topic; poor transitions -summarizes, but does not analyze	Unacceptable Intro is off-topic with no thesis; unorganized with no supports; conclusion does not relate to topic; no transitions -no evidence of analysis of required texts
Argument requirements 20 % -hook -working thesis -written with at least 3 confirming reasons. -counterclaim	Excellent Argument presented is of high quality with logical organization and is appropriately matched to the audience.	Good Argument presented is of good quality, and is mostly logical and well organized. The argument is appropriate for the audience.	Fair Argument presented is of good quality, basically logical and organized. The argument is appropriate for the audience.	Poor argument presented is lacking strong quality, has weak or no organization and logic. The argument is not appropriate for the audience.	Unacceptable missing more than three requirements
Command of Evidence 20 % the extent to which the writer presents textual evidence from the required texts to support analysis;the extent to which the writer chooses and uses primary and secondary sources to gain insights	Excellent -embeds all textual evidence thoroughly -makes highly effective use of a wide range of specific and relevant evidence to support analysis-Cited sources -Sources reliable --Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.	Good -embeds most textual evidence clearly and accurately-Cited sources --Sources mostly reliable. - Relevant information --Research of sufficient depth	Fair -embeds some textual evidence, but explains ideas sufficientlyNo parenthetical citations within the document, but it does have a Works Cited page. -Source reliability questionable. - some irrelevant information -some support of topic - Surface research.	Poor -presents ideas briefly making use of some evidence-Only 1 sources cited -Unreliable sources -Some information relevant to thesis. -Information provided supports some elements of topic	Unacceptable "plops" textual evidence without building context-No reliable sources - Unacceptable errors in citation -off topic.
Counter Argument & Refutation 10 % the extent to which the writer presents convincing, well supported counter argument with evidence and a refutation that effectively refutes that argument	Excellent Counter argument is complete. You stated a possible argument against your thesis and had a strong rebuttal.	Good Counter argument needs work. You stated a possible argument against your thesis but your rebuttal did not convince the reader.	Fair Counter argument is incomplete. You stated a possible argument against your thesis but either did not supply a rebuttal, or the rebuttal was incomplete.	Poor Counter-argument is NOT ADDRESSED or makes little sense.	Unacceptable Off-topic, unsupported, illogical rebuttals raised
MLA Research Compliance x2
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 4 pts	Unacceptable 2 pts
In Text MLA 10 % the extent to which the writer properly cites sources within the text of the paper	Excellent -No errors in MLA format. -3+ sources, cited correctly, and listed on Works Cited page	Good Less than 3 formatting errors in MLA format or 2 sources, - 1-3 citation error, or a source is not listed on the Works Cited page.	Fair More than 3 errors in MLA format. or 2 source / citation errors / incomplete Works Cited page.	Poor More than 6 errors in MLA format. or 1 source used / citation errors/ incomplete works cited.	Unacceptable Unacceptable amount of MLA errors and / or lack of sources.
Works Cited Page 10 % the extent to which the writer uses correct MLA documentation on the WCP: title, spacing, indentation, font, alphabetizing, completion, and accuracy	Excellent -No formatting errors -Correct Citations -Alphabetical	Good -Less than 3 formatting errors. or -minor citation errors or -not alphabetical.	Fair More than 3 formatting errors. or - major citation errors	Poor More than 6 formatting errors. or unacceptable amount of citation errors	Unacceptable No works cited page:
MLA Paper format 5 % margins title spacing font type & size header	Excellent -1 inch margin -12 point font -TNR or Arial -correct heading -correct header/pg. numbering -titled correctly	Good -less than 2 formatting errors	Fair -more than 2 formatting errors	Poor more than 4 formatting errors	Unacceptable more than 5 formatting errors
Conventions of Standard Written Eng
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 9 pts	Fair 8 pts	Poor 7 pts	Unacceptable 6 pts
Mechanics 5 % the extent to which the writer demonstrates command of standard English, grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling	Excellent There are few or no grammar / spelling errors; excellent word choice.	Good Minor errors in usage and spelling with very few grammatical errors.	Fair Six or more errors in usage, spelling, grammar, and mechanics	Poor Eight or more grammatical errors.	Unacceptable Excessive errors (10 or more); errors hinder comprehension and word choice is colloquial (informal).

Keywords:

MLA writing research

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16