iRubric: UW Trainer Interview rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

UW Trainer Interview

Teacher Interview

Rubric to be used by Interview Committee following UW Trainer presentation/interview.

Rubric Code: XX582A2

By slovig

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Trainer Presentation/Interview 100 %
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Professional Dress 5 %	Poor Dress is not professional	Fair Candidate dresses with minimal degree of professional presentation	Good Candidate dresses with reasonable degree of professional presentation	Excellent Candidate dresses with a high degree of professional presentation
Functional Knowledge 20 %	Poor Candidate has very little UW knowledge	Fair Candidate has some UW knowledge	Good Candidate has adequate UW knowledge	Excellent Candidate has comprehensive UW knowledge
Teaching-use of Experiences 10 %	Poor Candidate shows minimal ability to reflect on relevant experiences	Fair Candidate can reflect on small number of relevant experiences	Good Candidate can reflect on a variety of relevant experiences	Excellent Candidate can reflect on a wide variety of relevant experiences
Classroom Management 10 %	Poor Candidate has very little classroom management experience or does not demonstrate ability to control settings	Fair Candidate has some classroom management experience, and demonstrates some ability to control settings	Good Candidate demonstrates an understanding of the skills needed to effectively manage a classroom session	Excellent Candidate demonstrates the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively manage a classroom session
Collaborative Mindset 5 %	Poor Candidate sees no reason to collaborate with others or does not seem to see the value in doing so.	Fair Candidate can imagine some scenarios when collaboration might be a good idea, but does not see collaboration as a significant part of his/her professional development.	Good Candidate can easily describe at least one way in which some form of collaboration increased student achievement. Candidate seems eager to continue at least that form of collaboration at Sequoia.	Excellent Candidate uninterested in working in a non-collaborative environment. Might be able to give at least one example where /she took the lead in a collaborative group.
Speaking and Presentation 25 %	Poor Seems very nervous, unable to communicate with committee successfully, no eye contact	Fair Seems a bit nervous, struggles at times to communicate with committee, makes minimal eye contact	Good Seems somewhat confident, able to communiate with committee, makes some eye contact	Excellent Seems confident, able to communicate with committee effectively, makes appropriate eye contact
Corporate Training Experience 25 %	Poor Candidate has no experience in corporate training.	Fair Candidate has limited experience in corporate training. Candidate may have taught in other areas in different settings (online vs. classroom).	Good Candidate has some experience teaching in a corporate training environment. S/he may have recently taught in different settings.	Excellent Candidate demonstrates previous corporate training abilities, and shows excellent management of subject and setting.

Keywords:

Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric