iRubric: Persuasive Editorial rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Persuasive Editorial

Students will write a persuasive editorial of their choice topic, while establishing a distinctive voice in their writing Learning Goals: Write in a variety of genres such as editorials.Access and use language to construct and demonstrate knowledge. Organize writing so that it has an inviting introduction, a logical progression of ideas, and a purposeful conclusion. Develop ideas and content with significant details, examples, and/or reasons to address a prompt.

Rubric Code: XX285W4

By brittanybajc

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: (none)

Criterion
	Exceeding Standard 4 pts	Meeting Standard 3 pts	Progressing Toward Standard 2 pts	Does Not Meet Standadrd 1 pts	Peer Score (N/A)	Teacher Score (N/A)
Knowledge and Understanding	Exceeding Standard - Content is comprehensive and persuasive. - Persuasive appeals are identifiable and accurately used. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported with good details. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear.	Meeting Standard - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. - Persuasive appeals are identifiable but questionable. - Major points are addressed, but not well supported. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Progressing Toward Standard - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive. -Lack of persuasive appeals	Does Not Meet Standadrd - Incomplete	Peer Score	Teacher Score
Organization & Structure	Exceeding Standard - 2 or more paragraphs which follow the editorial structure. - Opposing opinion is present and clearly addressed for the reader.	Meeting Standard - 2 paragraphs which follow the editorial structure. - Paragraph transitions need some improvement. - Opposing opinion is present and/or addressed.	Progressing Toward Standard - Organization and structure are lacking and effect the content. - Editorial is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts. - Less than 2 paragraphs. -Lack of opposing argument.	Does Not Meet Standadrd - Incomplete	Peer Score	Teacher Score
Thinking and Inquiry	Exceeding Standard - Uses planning skills with a high degree of effectiveness. - Research is evident and a clear transfer of knowledge supports students ideas.	Meeting Standard - Uses planning skills with considerable effectiveness. - Research is clear and supports students ideas.	Progressing Toward Standard - Uses planning skills with some effectiveness. - Research is unclear and does not supports students ideas.	Does Not Meet Standadrd -Incomplete	Peer Score	Teacher Score
Work Habits	Exceeding Standard - Turned in on time - typed - all components are turned in: brainstorm/outline, rough draft, peer revision/edit, final draft	Meeting Standard - Turned in on time - typed - Missing 1 component of the following: brainstorm/outline, rough draft, peer revision/edit, final draft	Progressing Toward Standard - Turned late - not typed - Missing 2 components of the following: brainstorm/outline, rough draft, peer revision/edit, final draft	Does Not Meet Standadrd - Illegible/ No rough draft completed.	Peer Score	Teacher Score

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric