iRubric: CLINICAL OPERATIVE REPORT RUBRIC

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

CLINICAL OPERATIVE REPORT RUBRIC

The student will compose a report based clinical experience and research they have done on a surgical procedure of choice done this clinical semester.

Rubric Code: XA65BC

By gjbarrera

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Medical

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Operative Report 100 %
	Excellent 40 pts	Good 30 pts	Sufficient 20 pts	Insufficient 10 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Report Completion /Format /Layout 5 %	Excellent The report includes all required components and follows formatting guidelines. Format and layout make the report exceptionally attractive, drawing attention to the content, and enhancing readability.	Good Almost all required components are included; formatting guidelines are almost always followed. 1-2 problems in format and layout, but readability and attractiveness are not affected.	Sufficient Some required components are included; formatting guidelines are sometimes followed. 3-4 problems in format and layout, but the report is easy to read.	Insufficient Required components are mostly absent; formatting is repeatedly inconsistent, reducing readability and attractiveness.	Unacceptable Off-topic; formatting guidelines are not followed, making the report unattractive or hard to read.
Organization 5 %	Excellent The content of the paper is accurate. The paper meets the requirements of the assignment. The organization of the paper is logical and aides understanding of the reader. The author holds the attention of the reader with compelling examples and explanations.	Good The content of the paper is accurate. The paper meets the requirements of the assignment. The organization of the paper is logical and aides understanding of the reader. The auther gives examples and explanations.	Sufficient The content of the paper is accurate, but the paper does not meet the requirements of the assignment. The organization of the paper is logical and aides understanding of the reader, however few or no examples are given. Explanations are limited.	Insufficient Not all of the content of the paper is accurate, therefore the paper does not meet the requirements of the assignment. The organization of the paper lacks logic and does not aide understanding of the reader.	Unacceptable The content of the paper is not accurate, therefore the paper does not meet the requirements of the assignment. Little organization is evident in the written product. The paper is difficult for the reader to follow.
Grammar/Spelling/Punctuation 5 %	Excellent Hardly any errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation and grammar. Variety of sentence patterns (simple, compound, complex), effectively used	Good Spelling, capitalization and punctuation are few and not distracting. Mastery of sentence patterns demonstrated; may have occasional grammatical errors.	Sufficient Occasional errors in spelling, capitalization and punctuation, sometimes distracting. Sentence patterns most often successfully used; several grammatical errors (e.g. word deletions/ additions, prep., tense).	Insufficient Spelling, capitalization and punctuation errors are frequent and distracting and sometimes interfere with understanding. Simple and complex sentences attempted but often unsuccessful; Grammatical errors distract from meaning.	Unacceptable Spelling, capitalization and punctuation errors throughout. attempts at simple sentences often not successful; many grammatical errors that severely interfere with understanding.
Procedural Explanation 40 %	Excellent Explains procedure in detail: rolls of participants in room, sterile setup, procedure, closure and dressing ow wound clearly explained. Writer explains reasons for choices made and creates credibility.	Good Clear and complete development of procedural explanation; Some information about procedure may be missing. Writer explains reasons for choices made and/or creates credibility.	Sufficient Procedural detail adequate, but lacks clearly stated throughout procedure. Writer explains reasons for choices made and/or creates credibility.	Insufficient Procedural detail incomplete or unclear. Writer does not explain choices made or create credibility.	Unacceptable Little to no procedural detail or incorrect detail provided.
Illustrations 20 %	Excellent Content supported effectively by at least three illustrations; Illustrations are titled and numbered. All illustrations are explained in detail. Sophistication in fluency of expression.	Good Content supported by at least 3 illustrations. Illustrations are explained in sufficient detail and appropriate format. High level of fluency in expression (clarity); evidence of logical progression of ideas	Sufficient Some of the content supported but should include more illustrations; some explanations of illustrations; illustrations sometimes presented in appropriate format; documentation sometimes missing; fluency of expression may be halting or awkward	Insufficient Little support of content by illustrations; incomplete or missing explanations of illustrations; data not presented in appropriate format; lack of fluency in expression	Unacceptable No support of content by illustrations; minimal explanations of illustrations; data not presented in appropriate format; no support argument
Conclusion 10 %	Excellent Student comments appropriate for procedure. Reflective statements referring to clinical experiences and procedure. ts for the reader. No new evidence or details are introduced. Does not merely summarize the report.	Good Student comments mostly based on clinical experience and procedure. The conclusion relatively short and to the point. No new evidence or details are introduced. Does not merely summarize the report.	Sufficient Student comments some what based on clinical experience and procedure. The conclusion relatively short and to the point. No new evidence or details are introduced. Does not merely summarize the report.	Insufficient Student comments not completely based on clinical experience and procedure. New evidence or details are introduced. Merely summarizes the report.	Unacceptable Student comments not based on clinical experience or procedure at all. New evidence or details introduced. Adds nothing to report.
Works Cited 15 %	Excellent Literature review is relevant for topic and 5 credible sources are accurately paraphrased, quoted and referenced to. Writer uses sources to support own research. Works properly cited in APA format. All sources 5 years old or less.	Good Most of the literature used is relevant for topic and 5 credible source are accurately paraphrased, quoted and referenced to. Writer uses most sources to support own research. Works properly cited in APA format. Most sources 5 years old or less.	Sufficient Some of the literature used is relevant for topic and not all 5 sources are credible and/or not all sources are accurately paraphrased, quoted and referenced to. Writer uses some sources to support own research. Works cited in APA format, but with some mistakes. Some sources 5 years old or less.	Insufficient Most of the literature used is not relevant for topic and not all sources are credible and/or not all sources are accurately paraphrased, quoted and referenced to. Writer uses some sources to support own research. Works cited in APA format with several mistakes. Few sources are 5 years old or less.	Unacceptable Most of the literature is not relevant for topic and most sources are not credible and/or most sources are not accurately paraphrases, quoted and referenced to. Writer doesn't use sources to support own research. Works not cited or not in APA format. No sources are 5 years old or less.

Keywords:

Clinical Report

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric