iRubric: Project with Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Project with Presentation Rubric

Group Skit Presentation Rubric-Professionalism

General rubric for projects that will be presented to a group

Rubric Code: X2WB27A

By hseyfert

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Project with Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 3 pts
Content 50 %	Excellent Topic was introduced. Group members had a good understanding of the topic and content and presented it thoroughly. Each component in the list of criteria was met with supporting details. Presentation followed criteria as specified. Minimum number of resources were used and cited.	Good Topic was introduced. Group members displayed understanding of the topic and content. Presentation was missing 1-2 items from the list of criteria. Presentation followed criteria as specified. Minimum number of resources were used and cited.	Fair Topic was not introduced. Group members displayed only having a superficial understanding of topic and content. Presentation was missing 3-4 items from the list of criteria. Presentation did not follow criteria as specified. Minimum number of resources were used and cited.	Poor Topic was not introduced. Group members had little to no understanding of the topic and content. Presentation was missing 5+ items from the list of criteria. Presentation did not follow criteria as specified. No resources were used and/or cited.
Presentation/Organization 20 %	Excellent Presentation was very organized and easy to follow. No spelling or grammar errors were present on the visual aids. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly. Members maintained good eye contact with audience and were easily heard.	Good Presentation was fairly organized and fairly easy to follow. 1-2 spelling or grammar errors were present on the visual aids. Transitions might have been slightly choppy but did not take away from the overall presentation. Members tried to make good eye contact with some volume issues. Sometimes audience could not hear the group members.	Fair Presentation was not clearly organized. 3-4 spelling or grammar errors were present on the visual aids. Transitions between members were inconsistent or awkward. Eye contact was not maintained. Sometimes audience could not hear the group members.	Poor Presentation lacked organization. 5+ spelling or grammar errors were made on the visual aids. Poor transitions between group members. Presentation lacked order and was difficult to follow. No attempt at eye contact was made. Any speech was inaudible.
Learning Activities 10 %	Excellent Group members used engaging activities to supplement and assess learning of required components from the presentation.	Good	Fair	Poor Learning activities were not effective or used at all.
Teamwork/Participation 10 %	Excellent The presentation was shared equally among the group members per the peer feedback form and teacher observation.	Good The group worked and communicated well with each other. Some members of the of the group participated slightly more than the others per the peer feedback form and teacher observation.	Fair Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the project/presentation and others did not participate much per the peer feedback form and teacher observation.	Poor Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation/project. One or some group members dominated the project/presentation while others did not participate per peer feedback form and teacher observation.
Time Management 5 %	Excellent Members of the group utilized their time wisely in preparation of the project with no distractions. Presentation lasted more than or equal to the required time.	Good Members of the group utilized their time fairly well in preparation of the project with occasional distractions.	Fair Members of the group utilized their time wisely in preparation of the project.	Poor Members of the group did not utilize their time wisely.
Time Limit 5 %	Excellent Presentation lasted more than or equal to the minimum time requirement.	Good	Fair	Poor Presentation did not meet the minimum time requirement.

Keywords:

Project Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric