Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: YouTube Video Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
YouTube Video Project
YouTube Math Video Project
Students are to create a Youtube video demonstrating their knowledge of proportions, two step equations, similar figures, or comparing and ordering negative numbers.
Rubric Code:
X2WA88C
By
Latoya_Thomas
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Video Project
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Total
(N/A)
Strong Concept
Excellent
The viewer can learn things that are of real educational value.
In depth knowledge of topic is shown. The message is clear, strong and complete. (20 pts)
Good
The viewer has a chance to learn but may get confused by 1 or 2 ideas in video. Some knowledge of topic is shown. Essential information is communicated. (16-24 pts)
Fair
The view learns a limited amount from the program. Ideas are confusing. Limited knowledge of the topic is shown. The message is vaguely communicated. (8-15 pts)
Poor
The viewer does not learn from the program. Concepts covered are too confusing. <BR>
Little or no knowledge of the topic is shown. The message is unclear. (0-7 pts)
Total
Marketing
Excellent
The video has 100 or more subscribers and likes and 5 positive comments(20 points)
Good
The video has 75 or more subscribers and 3 positive comment (14-19 pts)
Fair
The video has 50 or more subscribers and 1 positive comment.(7-13 pts)
Poor
The video has fewer than 50 subscribers and less than 1 positive comment.(0-6)
Total
Use of Materials
Excellent
The video quality is very good and shows very good knowledge of camera angles, camera shots, and editing.<BR>
Props explain and reinforce key points and are used in creative ways. (20 pts)
Good
The video quality is okay and shows some knowledge of camera angles, camera shots, and editing. <BR>
Props assist the audience in understanding the flow of information. (14-19 pts)
Fair
The program quality is not very good and shows little knowledge of camera angles, camera shots, and editing.<BR>
Props occasionally support understanding of the content. (7-13 pts)
Poor
The program is not suitable to air on the world wide web. Props may be distracting and do not enhance the understanding of the content. (0-6 pts)
Total
Audio Voice & Music
Excellent
Audio is clear and effectively assists in communicating the main idea. <BR>
Ideas are communicated with enthusiasm, proper voice projection, appropriate language and clear delivery. (20 pts)
Good
The audio is clear but may only partially assist in communicating the main idea. <BR>
Ideas are communicated with proper voice projection, adequate preparation and delivery. (14-19 pts)
Fair
The audio is inconsistent (too loud/too soft/garbled) and insufficiently communicates the main idea.<BR>
Ideas are communicated with weak voice projection and/or lack of preparation. (7-13 pts)
Poor
Audio is inconsistent. There is poor voice projection, making it difficult to communicate ideas. (0-6 pts)
Total
Student Responsibility
Excellent
There is evidence that you have a clear role and have met 110% of your responsibilities. You went over and above. (15 pts)
Good
There is evidence that you had a clear role and met 80-100% of your responsibilites. (8-14 points)
Fair
There is evidence that you met 60-79% of your reponsibilities. (5-7 points)
Poor
You did little to help your group and someone else had to pick up your slack. (0-4 points)
Total
On time
Excellent
On time (minus 0 points)
Good
Late - one day (less 10 points)
Fair
Late - 2-3 days (less 15 points)
Poor
Late - 4 or more days (less 20 points)
Total
Copyright & INFO Section
Excellent
Copyright laws were clearly followed and info was provided in the comments written in complete sentences and a neat script is turned in with 0 grammatical errors. (5 pts)
Good
Copyright laws were clearly followed and info was provided in the comments written in complete sentences and a neat script is turned in with 1-2 grammatical errors.(4 pts)
Fair
Copyright laws were not clearly followed and info was provided in the comments written in complete sentences and a neat script is turned in with 2-3 grammatical errors.(2-3 pts)
Poor
Copyright laws were clearly followed and info was provided in the comments written in complete sentences and a neat script is turned in with 3 or grammatical errors. (0-1 pts)
Total
Subjects:
Business
Math
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.