Skip to main content
iRubric: OCS Talk 2020 rubric

iRubric: OCS Talk 2020 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
OCS Talk 2020 
OCS Talk
This rubric is for the OCS Talk for Grade 9/10 Humanities. Standards were built by the students. PechaKucha presentation format.
Rubric Code: X2W86X3
By jwirtz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric OCS Talk
  Not Acceptable

1 pts

Below Expectations

2 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Proficient

4 pts

Mastery

5 pts

Content

Not Acceptable

Lacked a significant amount of information necessary to fully understand the topic. Did not provide enough evidence or resources.
Below Expectations

Not quite enough information to develop topic. Lacking connections to some of the main points. Quite a few errors. An clear idea, but maybe not worth sharing.
Acceptable

Presented a good amount of information, but may have lacked a couple elements that would have helped the audience fully understand the topic. Provided most of the necessary information.
Proficient

Fully accomplished the task set-out, with a big idea and elements that allowed the audience to fully understand the topic presented.
Mastery

Fully developed their presentation above and beyond the content expectations with a strong hook, thesis, and call to action. A big idea worth sharing..
Clarity

Not Acceptable

Voice, tone, diction, and flow were unprepared, unclear, and/or inappropriate. Did not engage the audience in any meaningful way.
Below Expectations

More than one element of speaking was not up to standard; including, clarity, volume, tone, and/or body language. Was not off script.
Acceptable

Spoke clearly enough, but may have struggled at times and needed to read their script multiple time.
Proficient

Spoke eloquently and clear, with a natural pace and engagement. Obviously rehearsed, but may have had to glance at their slides.
Mastery

Completely natural and "off-script" speaking ability. They presented the information in an engaging way that told a clear story, using tone, pitch, and diction to get their point across.
Consultation

Not Acceptable

May have only had one source, or only had one appropriate source.
Below Expectations

May have only had two sources, or only had two appropriate source.
Acceptable

Had three sources, or some sources were not credible and/or reliable.
Proficient

Had four sources, or a source that was not credible and reliable.
Mastery

Had five quality sources. One primary source was used in the presentation.
Capture (visual)

Not Acceptable

Lacked an appropriate visual, did not follow visual guidelines in many ways, and/or was not able to utilize visual during their speech.
Below Expectations

Technology follows somewhat of a PechKucha format, but may be missing quite a few slides, is not time correctly, and/or they do not all enhance the presentation.
Acceptable

Had a visual that showed some information and interesting images, but may have lacked proper formatting, consistency, balance/flow/theme/harmony, and/or distracted more than reinforced.
Proficient

Visual was thoughtfully done to enhance the presentation and engage the audience fully. Followed a PechaKuch format that was self-playing. May have missed a slide or a couple slides were not effective.
Mastery

Visual was thoughtfully woven together, telling a story that fully engaged the audience along with the speech. Student interacted with the visual and showed mastery of using a PechaKucha visual to enhance their presentation.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16