iRubric: Teacher Evaluation for Macromolecule Assignment rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Teacher Evaluation for Macromolecule Assignment

Upon completion of the research and presentation of information to their peers, the overall group product will be evaluated by the teacher

Rubric Code: X2434B

By CathyRenaud

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Biology

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Teacher Group Evaluation Enter rubric description
	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Great 3 pts
Work ethic Involvement of all members of the group during preparation of the information	Fair Members of the group are not always focused on the project; some members seem to be doing the bulk of the work.	Good Members of the group are generally focused and working throughout the class; each member is contributing but the distribution of the work does not seem equitable	Great All members are engaged throughout each class and work is shared in an equitable manner
Preparation How prepared the group was for presenting to their peers	Fair Group members seemed disorganized and unprepared for the start of their lesson; confusion on where materials were or what needed to be covered was obvious	Good Some initial confusion but the issues were minor and the group quickly dealt with the issues	Great The group was organized and ready to get started. There was no confusion prior to the leason and all members knew what they had to do.
Model Completion and use of the model	Fair The model was not completed and had little if any impact on explaining an aspect of the macromolecule	Good The model was ready or partically ready and had some impact on the lesson but could have been better	Great The model was completed and was used to emaphsize a key aspect or role of the macrolmolcule. The lesson was enhanced by the model
Assessment overview Professional look to the assessment and when it was submitted for copying	Fair The assessment is hand written and is submitted with insufficient time for the teacher to copy prior to the class	Good The assessment is word processed but the formating could be more professional; the assessment is submit prior to class with a reasonable amount of time for copying	Great The assessment looks professional and is submitted with sufficient time to allow copying to be completed with ease
Assessment content Does the assessment target the key issues related to the molecule; does it demonstrate thoughtful preparation?	Fair The assessment does not cover the key issues related to the macromolecule; little thought about the content and how it emphasizes the key issues is evident	Good The assessment hits on some of the key issues related to the molecule but also covers points that are not essential. Thoughtful consideration about the content is evident in some portions of the assessment	Great The assessment focuses on the key issues that the group wants to evaluate the understanding of; Thoughtful consideration is evident throughout the assessment
Student evaluation of assessment Is there an answer key prepared with point assignments? How quickly the assessment is graded and returned to the group.	Fair There is no grading key for the assessment and the students do not get feedback on how they did in a timely fashion (by the next class at the latest)	Good There is a key but the key may not provide sufficient detail for others to follow and/or the assessment is not returned in a timely fashion (by the next class at the latest)	Great The assessment key is clear and easy to follow. The assessment is returned in a timely fashion (by the next class)
Completion of tasks Are the grades for each group tested recorded and submitted to the teacher in a timely fashion?	Fair Assessment grades are not submitted to the teacher; the teacher must ask for the grades	Good Assessment grades are not submitted in a timely fashion, the same day that the assessments are returned	Great Assessment grades are submitted to the teacher the same day that the assessment is returned to the students (no later than the next class)

Subjects:

Biology

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric