Skip to main content
iRubric: Creative Projects rubric

iRubric: Creative Projects rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Creative Projects 
Creative Projects
Rubric Code: X22872B
By kalyani0927
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Creative Project Rubric
Communication and Global Studies
  EXEMPLARY

5 pts

STRONG

4 pts

PROFICIENT

3 pts

DEVELOPING

2 pts

IDEAS & CONTENT

Are all required elements present? Are the presented contents essential, relevant, and within the time limit?
EXEMPLARY

Shows a clear progression of ideas with excellent, well thought out explanations tying it together. Thought provoking, moving, focused and insightful. All points are supported well.
STRONG

Format is clear, with ideas that do not surprise us, but are well thought out and supported. All required elements are present even if there is a problem with balance. Good detail and visuals.
PROFICIENT

Clearly evident main ideas with some support, although we may feel we need more. Ideas are predictable, as are the visuals. The elements may be unbalanced; some required elements may be missing.
DEVELOPING

Main ideas are simplistic; details are limited. May go off topic; be cliched.
May be difficult to follow clearly or have no clear point.
Poor quality.
ORGANIZATION

Is there a logical flow to information/elements?
Is there a clear argument, point, solution/advocacy?
EXEMPLARY

Compelling, creative, and logical. Has an inviting introduction and strong closure. Thesis or main idea is clearly identified and support is logical in choice and arrangement.
STRONG

Format is clear, focused and logical, but not particularly creative. Intro is present and relevant, and it ends well. The thesis or main point is made clear but may be overstated or understated.
PROFICIENT

Format is acceptable, but not necessarily sequential or logically organized. Support may seem out of balance; it may seem hard to follow the presentation, or it is short, with limited visuals.
DEVELOPING

Portions are hard to follow as they are not put together in any clear order. It may be a list. Intro and closure may be "My topic is..." or absent. May use numbers.
CREATIVITY & DESIGN

Is it interesting? Do the elements enhance? Are the materials/video engaging, appropriate and effective?
EXEMPLARY

Excellent use of camera and angles, with good focus and quality. Smooth transitions & clear reasons for each element. Elements are creative, unexpected and relevant.
STRONG

Good use of graphics, etc. Sound quality is okay. Video clips are clear, in focus and useful for the point.
PROFICIENT

Minimal use of design elements, or dependence on PowerPoint or other template. Clips and photos are clear and focused, but there may to too many of one kind, or not equal for each element.
DEVELOPING

Elements detract by being gaudy or overly simple, or too many. Crowded text areas; graphics may not be clear.
MECHANICS &

DOCUMENTATION
Is grammar correct? Are all borrowed elements credited?
Does it show ownership? Are all the team members present or acknowledged?
EXEMPLARY

The borrowed elements are all credited; there are no errors. Copyright law has been followed.
Ownership of project is clearly manifested.
STRONG

Credit was given for all important elements; credit may not be in perfect order; Very few errors. Copyright law has been followed. Ownership evident.
PROFICIENT

There may be errors , and not all elements have been cited. Copyright law is not correctly followed. Ownership of project not fully manifested.
DEVELOPING

There are many errors; Documentation is sketchy or absent; Proper credits not given; No ownership of project presented.
EFFORT

Are originality and accountability evident? Is effort manifested in the overall project?
EXEMPLARY

Effort is very much reflected in the planning, execution and final project output.
STRONG

Effort is not evident in most aspects of the project. Planning is apparent in final output.
PROFICIENT

Effort is evident in some aspects of the project. Limited accountability and effort as reflected in final output.
DEVELOPING

Project reflects no effort or originality ; shows little or no accountability or effort



Keywords:
  • Video, video presentation, student presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98