Skip to main content
iRubric: Persuasive Campaign Rubric

iRubric: Persuasive Campaign Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Persuasive Campaign Rubric 
The purpose of this assignment is to give you experience in designing a persuasive campaign that addresses a particularly relevant concern for your business or community. This is your chance to capitalize on your skills in order to provide effective service for other organizations. Generally, this paper should be a minimum of 10 pages and no more than 20. Please include a detailed description of any campaign materials you would create if you were running this campaign.
Rubric Code: WXC93B9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Campaign Rubric
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Needs Improvement

(N/A)

Unsatisfactory

(N/A)

Research

120 points

Excellent

­­Cited 3 or more valid theories. ­­Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.. ­­Research in­-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained. ­­Provided a minimum of 10 outside sources.
Good

­­Cited 3 theories. ­­Sources mostly reliable. ­­Sufficient information provided to support thesis. ­­Research of sufficient depth. ­­Provided a minimum of 8 outside sources to
back up points.
Needs Improvement

­­ Cited 2 theories. ­­Source reliability questionable or not considered scholarly in nature. ­­Some information relevant to thesis ­­Surface research. ­­Provided a minimum of 6 outside sources to
back up points.
Unsatisfactory

­­Failed to cite at least 2 sources. ­­Sources unreliable. ­­Irrelevant to thesis and does not support the topic. ­­Surface research. ­­Provided 5 or fewer outside sources to
back up points.
Content 120 points

This area looks at how fully the six areas detailed in the explanation of the campaign are met

Excellent

--Problem and effects clearly identified and explained in detail
--Target populations(s) clearly identified and explained in detail
--Clear and full explanation of what previous campaigns have done
--Ways to overcome the problems identified above are thoroughly thought-out and explained
--Content clearly connects with course content/theories
--Excellent explanation as to why this campaign, versus previous campaigns, will work
Good

--Problem and effects somewhat clear
--Target population fairly identified and explained
--Somewhat clear explanation of previous campaigns
--Relatively good explanation of ways to overcome problems with previous campaigns
--Explanation as to why this campaign will work is relatively good
Needs Improvement

--Problem and effects lack clarity and explanation
--Target population is barely identified and explained
--Unclear explanation of previous campaigns
--Fair explanation of ways to overcome problems with previous campaigns
--Explanation as to why this campaign will work unclear
Unsatisfactory

--Problem and effects are not clear and/or explained
--Target population not identified or explained
--Previous campaigns and problems are not identified or explained
--Ways to overcome problems with previous campaigns are lacking
--Explanation as to why this campaign will work is either not there, or does not make any logical sense
Grammar and Mechanics 80 pts

Enter description

Excellent

­­Consistent and appropriate voice. ­­ Sophisticated and precise word choice. ­­No spelling errors. ­­No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
­­ No punctuation or capitalization errors. <BR>
­­Met all style and min/max page
requirements
Good

­­ Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
­­ Fairly effective word choice.
­­No more than 2 spelling errors. ­­Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
­­ Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors. ­­Met most style and min/max page
requirements
Needs Improvement

­­ Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
­­ Correct word choice. ­­More than 3 spelling
errors.
­­More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
­­ More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors. Attempted to meet style and/or min/max
page requirements
Unsatisfactory

­­ Voice inconsistent and inappropriate. ­­ Incorrect word choices. ­­More than 5 spelling
errors.
­­More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
­­ More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors. Does not meet style and/or min/max page
requirements
Format

40 Points

Excellent

­­All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. ­­Contains compelling, clear subtitles and
resources page.
Good

­­All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. ­Contains clear and concise subtitles, and
resources page.
Needs Improvement

­­Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography but includes subtitles,
and resources page.
Unsatisfactory

­­Most sources are not properly cited in the paper and bibliography. ­­Missing subtitles,
and resources page.
Interest

40 Points

Excellent

­­There is nuance, inference and subtlety to the campaign. ­­Reader can clearly relate with the problem, target populations, understand and identify with the problems and how to overcome them and gets a sense that the campaign will work.
Good

­­There is some nuance, inference and subtlety to the campaign, but is not located throughout the paper. ­­Reader can somewhat relate with the problem, target populations, understand and identify with the problems and how to overcome them and gets a sense that the campaign might work, though it needs further explication.
Needs Improvement

­­There is little nuance, inference and subtlety to the campaign. ­­Reader barely relate with the problem, cannot clearly identify target populations, finds it difficult to understand and identify with the problems and how to overcome them, and does not gets a sense that the campaign will work.
Unsatisfactory

­­There is no nuance, inference and subtlety to the campaign. ­­Reader cannot relate with the problem, target populations, or understand and identify with the problems and how to overcome them. The reader is left with the impression that the campaign will fail.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98