Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Compare/Contrast Writing: 2 Versions of the same news story rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Compare/Contrast Writing: 2 Versions of the same news story
Compare/Contrast Writing: 2 Versions of the same news story
The purpose of this rubric is to allow the students to know what the expectations are for writing a comparing/contrasting news reporting and/or case studies. The student will work with a partner to compare and contrast two versions of the same news story/case study on an issue using a graphic organizer.
Rubric Code:
WXB52W6
By
harristoro
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Forensic Science
News and/or Forensic Files case studies
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Focus of Crime
Background Information
Excellent
Students are able answer questions accurately and fluently about their analysis of the case study.
Good
Students are able to address most questions asked about their analysis of the case study.
Fair
Students are having difficulty addressing some of the questions asked about their analysis of the reporting case study.
Needs Improvement
Students are having substantial difficulty addressing some of the questions asked about their analysis of the reporting, after the presentation.
Comparison points
Excellent
There are (4) four clear and distinct comparison examples between the cases.
Good
There are at least (3) three comparison examples between the cases.
Fair
There are (2) two clear comparison examples between the cases.
Needs Improvement
Student has provided (1) or no clear comparison examples between the cases.
Contrasting points
Excellent
There are (4) four clear and distinct contrasting examples between the cases.
Good
There are at least (3) three contrasting examples between the cases.
Fair
There are (2) two clear contrasting examples between the cases.
Needs Improvement
Student has (1) or no clear or fewer contrasting examples between the cases.
Organization
relate each idea component
Excellent
Clear evidence descriptors are used compare and contrast transition words given for each idea.
Good
Good or appropriate compare and contrast evidence descriptors utilized for each idea.
Fair
Uses fairly clear compare and contrast evidence descriptors for each idea.
Needs Improvement
No response or no clear compare and contrast evidence descriptor utilized.
Conventions
Excellent
Sentences are clear and punctuation is used to separate sentences. There is an indentation at the beginning of each paragraph. Capitalization of sentences, proper nouns, and titles is thorough. Proper spelling is used throughout.
Good
Most sentences are clear and end punctuation is used. Some paragraphs are indented. Capitalization is mostly correct. Most sentences contain proper spelling.
Fair
Sentences show some attention to completeness and punctuation. Indentation may or may not be present. Shows some understanding and attention to capitalization. Some words are misspelled.
Needs Improvement
Sentences may be unclear and punctuation is often missing. Paragraphs are not indented. Demonstrates little understanding or or attention to capitalization. Many words are misspelled.
Conclusion
Excellent
Summary states a thoughtful and logical conclusion based on the similarities and differences.
Good
Summary states a conclusion based on similarities and differences.
Fair
Summary states a conclusion but does not draw on any similarities or differences.
Needs Improvement
No evidence of any conclusion or summary.
Organization
Excellent
Graphic organizer is fully completed, neat, and includes your best work. All directions were followed. The presentation is creative, precise, visually appealing .
Good
Graphic organizer is completed, neat, and includes some of your best work. All directions were mostly followed. The presentation is precise and visually appealing.
Fair
Presentation is completed, and neat. Some directions were mostly followed. The presentation is precise.
Needs Improvement
Presentation is not completed, and/ or very messy. Directions were not followed. The presentation is imprecise.
Keywords:
Compare/Contrast Essay, Writing, Essays, English,
Subjects:
English
Journalism
Science
Types:
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
ePortfolio
Assessment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.