Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Kindred Essay Honors 2018 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Kindred Essay Honors 2018
Rubric Code:
WX89B7X
By
AriKarpel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Literary Analysis Essay
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Competence
2 pts
Proficiency
3 pts
Mastery
4 pts
Introduction
Needs Improvement
Introductory paragraph needs work. Thesis statement is confusing or does not clearly reflect the text.
Competence
Introductory paragraph does not summarize the book appropriately. Thesis statement represents an aspect of the text but lacks clarity.
Proficiency
Introductory paragraph does not have an effective "hook." Thesis is stated in a clear and effective manner and reasonably reflects the text.
Mastery
Introductory paragraph captures the reader's attention and summarizes the book appropriately. Thesis is stated in a clear and effective manner, accurately reflects the text and demonstrates original thinking.
Evidence
Needs Improvement
There are only three pieces of textual evidence.
Competence
There are four pieces of textual evidence and each one logically and persuasively supports the thesis. Or there are five pieces of textual evidence and they more or less support the thesis.
Proficiency
There are five pieces of textual evidence and each one logically and persuasively supports the thesis. Or there are six pieces of textual evidence and they more or less support the thesis.
Mastery
There are six pieces of textual evidence and each one logically and persuasively supports the thesis.
Language
Needs Improvement
Paper does not consistently use academic language or grade level-appropriate vocabulary. Transitions are non-existent.
Competence
Paper does not use grade level-appropriate vocabulary and might stray from academic language. Transitions are choppy. There are significant spelling or grammatical errors.
Proficiency
Paper uses grade level-appropriate vocabulary and academic language. Spelling and punctuation errors are minimal. Subject-verb agreement is mostly followed.
Transitions are made fluidly but utilize cliches such as "First," and "In conclusion."
Mastery
Paper uses grade level-appropriate vocabulary and academic language. There are no spelling or punctuation errors; subjects and verbs are in agreement. Transitions are made fluidly, using effective wording.
Organization
Needs Improvement
Topic sentences do not introduce each paragraph effectively. Paragraphs do not flow in a logical sequence. MLA format is not followed.
Competence
Paragraphs do not adhere to the "Paragraph Sandwich" model. Topic sentences lack clarity. The flow needs some work. There are numerous mistakes in MLA formatting.
Proficiency
Paragraphs mostly follow the "Paragraph Sandwich" model. Paper mostly adheres to MLA format.
Mastery
Paragraphs follow the logical sequence of the "Paragraph Sandwich." Paper adheres to MLA format. Topic sentences introduce each paragraph effectively.
Subjects:
English
Education
Types:
Writing
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.