iRubric: In Catilinam rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

In Catilinam

Caesar vs. Cicero in re the legality of the execution of the accused senators without a trial

Rubric Code: WX2W2C4

By ascruggs

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

In Catilinam
	Optime 5 points 5 pts	Bene 4 points 4 pts	Esto 3 points 3 pts	Male 2 points 2 pts	Nihil 0-1 points 1 pts
In toto (overall)
Overall Performance - GROUP Omnes	Optime Group has used class time wisely and has put care and effort into the process.	Bene Group has to be redirected once and did put care and effort into the process.	Esto Group has to be redirected several times and did put some care and effort into the process.	Male Group has to be redirected more than three times and put neither care nor effort into the process.	Nihil Group wasted more than 50% of the class time and put neither care nor effort into the process.
Use of quotes Omnes	Optime Througout the debate, the group uses at least four quotes in Latin from the translations about Catiline.	Bene Througout the debate, the group uses at least three quotes in Latin from the translations about Catiline.	Esto Througout the debate, the group uses at least two quotes in Latin from the translations about Catiline.	Male Througout the debate, the group uses only one quote in Latin from the translations about Catiline.	Nihil The group uses no quotes in Latin.
In Catilinam - Individ. Assign.
	Optime 10 10 pts	Bene 9 9 pts	Esto 8 8 pts	Male 7 7 pts	Nihil 0 0 pts
Initium The Boni will present the exordium, then the Populares. The Boni will then present the partitio, etc.
Exordium Introduction: The orator lays out the purpose of the speech. 1. Advocatus Senior Primus 2. Scriptor Exordii	Optime Addresses all questions: What kind of cause are you presenting? How is it an honorable cause? What is the character of the accused? What is the character of the accuser?	Bene Addresses three questions: What kind of cause are you presenting? How is it an honorable cause? What is the character of the accused? What is the character of the accuser?	Esto Addresses two questions: What kind of cause are you presenting? How is it an honorable cause? What is the character of the accused? What is the character of the accuser?	Male Addresses one question: What kind of cause are you presenting? How is it an honorable cause? What is the character of the accused? What is the character of the accuser?	Nihil Addresses none of the questions: What kind of cause are you presenting? How is it an honorable cause? What is the character of the accused? What is the character of the accuser?
Partitio The orator outlines the main points of the case. 1. Advocatus Junior Primus 2. Scriptor Partitionis	Optime Addresses all: Identifies & communicates the facts of the "conspiracy," the political parties involved, the time frame, and the preceding events	Bene Addresses three: Identifies & communicates the facts of the "conspiracy," the political parties involved, the time frame, and the preceding events	Esto Addresses two: Identifies & communicates the facts of the "conspiracy," the political parties involved, the time frame, and the preceding events	Male Addresses one: Identifies & communicates the facts of the "conspiracy," the political parties involved, the time frame, and the preceding events	Nihil Addresses none: Identifies & communicates the facts of the "conspiracy," the political parties involved, the time frame, and the preceding events
Confirmatio The orator provides the proof for the case. 1. Inquisitor 2. Arbitra 3. Advocatus Junior Secundus 4. Scriptor Confirmationis	Optime All of the following are proffered: Orator provides physical evidence, proof of motive, and witnesses for his side. All could have or DID exist in the actual case.	Bene Three of the following are proffered: Orator provides physical evidence, proof of motive, and witnesses for his side. All could have or DID exist in the actual case.	Esto Two of the following are proffered: Orator provides physical evidence, proof of motive, and witnesses for his side. All could have or DID exist in the actual case.	Male One of the following is proffered: Orator provides physical evidence, proof of motive, and witnesses for his side. All could have or DID exist in the actual case.	Nihil None of the following are proffered: Orator provides physical evidence, proof of motive, and witnesses for his side. All could have or DID exist in the actual case.
Mora (Intermission) Each side will have five minutes to amend its refutatio.
Refutatio Orator refutes any possible objections which the opposing sided suggests. 1. Advocatus Senior Secundus 2. Scriptor Refutationis	Optime Orator effectively refutes all of the following: motive, preceding events, physical proof, witnesses	Bene Orator effectively refutes three of the following: motive, preceding events, physical proof, witnesses	Esto Orator effectively refutes two of the following: motive, preceding events, physical proof, witnesses	Male Orator effectively refutes one of the following: motive, preceding events, physical proof, witnesses	Nihil Orator effectively refutes none of the following: motive, preceding events, physical proof, witnesses
Peroratio Orator provides a compelling and comprehensive closing argument. 1. Advocatus Senior Tertius 2. Scriptor Perorationis	Optime The orator does all of the following: provides a persuasive overarching theory for the case (not a summation of the events), uses at least three rhetorical devices in his argument, provides a morally acceptable reason to vote for his side. Finally the argument has unity, coherence, and emphasis.	Bene The orator does three of the following: provides a persuasive overarching theory for the case (not a summation of the events), uses at least three rhetorical devices in his argument, provides a morally acceptable reason to vote for his side. Finally the argument has unity, coherence, and emphasis.	Esto The orator does two of the following: provides a persuasive overarching theory for the case (not a summation of the events), uses at least three rhetorical devices in his argument, provides a morally acceptable reason to vote for his side. Finally the argument has unity, coherence, and emphasis.	Male The orator does one of the following: provides a persuasive overarching theory for the case (not a summation of the events), uses at least three rhetorical devices in his argument, provides a morally acceptable reason to vote for his side. Finally the argument has unity, coherence, and emphasis.	Nihil The orator does none of the following: provides a persuasive overarching theory for the case (not a summation of the events), uses at least three rhetorical devices in his argument, provides a morally acceptable reason to vote for his side. Finally the argument has unity, coherence, and emphasis.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric