iRubric: Forensic Anthropolgy Literature Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Forensic Anthropolgy Literature Review

Literature Review

Rubric for evaluating literature review

Rubric Code: WA6975

By LCooper7701

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 6-8

Rubric
	Failing 1 pts	Adequate C 2 pts	Proficient B 3 pts	Excelling A 4 pts
Content & Development	Failing NEEDS IMPROVEMENT -Content is incomplete. -Missing research. -Major points are not clear.	Adequate ADEQUATE -Content is not comprehensive. -Major points are addressed, but not well supported. -Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Proficient PROFICIENT -Content is accurate. -Major points are stated and are somewhat supported. -Content and purpose of the writing are mostly clear.	Excelling EXCELLING -Content is comprehensive and accurate. -Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. -Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Organization & Structure	Failing NEEDS IMPROVEMENT -Information in the assignment is disorganized, and not logically or effectively structured. -Paragraphs are not constructed well. -Sentences are not related within paragraphs.	Adequate ADEQUATE -Most information in the assignment is well-organized, with some well-constructed paragraphs. -Some paragraphs include an introductory sentence, explanations or details, and a concluding sentence.	Proficient PROFICIENT -Information in the assignment is well organized, with well constructed paragraphs. -Good connections among ideas are made. -Most paragraphs include an introductory sentence, explanations or details, a concluding sentence.	Excelling EXCELLING -Information in the assignment is logically and creatively organized and flows smoothly, with unity and coherence. -Evident, and smooth transitions throughout. -All paragraphs include an introductory sentence, explanation or details, and a concluding sentence.
Format	Failing NEEDS IMPROVEMENT -Assignment lacks many elements of correct formatting. -Student needs to use greater care in documenting sources.	Adequate ADEQUATE -Assignment follows most guidelines. -Assignment is under word length. -Student attempted to document sources.	Proficient PROFICIENT -Assignment is the appropriate length as described for the assignment. -Student attempted to document sources, but some are not in the correct format. -Some citations are used improperly.	Excelling EXCELLING -Assignment is the appropriate length as described for the assignment. -Student documented sources with great care. -Citations are used properly where needed.
Grammar, Punc., & Spell.	Failing NEEDS IMPROVEMENT -Student shows very little mastery of mechanics. -Numerous errors in capitalization, punctuation, spelling, and grammar greatly detract from the paper.	Adequate ADEQUATE -Student shows average mastery of mechanics. Although errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar are evident, the meaning mostly remains clear. Errors detract from the paper.	Proficient PROFICIENT -Student shows above average mastery of mechanics. -Spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammatical errors are minor and do not interfere seriously with the clarity and precision of the writing	Excelling EXCELLING -Student shows excellent mastery of mechanics. -Spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar are correct.

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric