Skip to main content

iRubric: SWK105 Journal rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

SWK105 Journal

Reflective Journal

Rubric Code: W4C2X2

By EasternSW

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criteria 100 %
	Outstanding Conceptualization 4 pts	Proficient Analysis 3 pts	Basic Description 2 pts	Below Expectations Minimal 1 pts	Fail Fail 0 pts
Brief Paper #4 10 %	Outstanding Brief Paper #4 was present.	Proficient --------	Basic --------	Below Expectations --------	Fail Brief Paper #4 was absent.
Journal Hours 10 %	Outstanding Entries reflected 10 or more hours of volunteer experience and identified the date/time for every day's entry.	Proficient Entries reflected 8-10 hours of volunteer experience and/or may or may not have identified the date/time for every day's entry.	Basic Entries reflected 6-8 hours of volunteer experience and may or may not have identified the date/time for every day's entry.	Below Expectations Entries reflected less than 4-6 hours of volunteer experience and/or did not include date/time.	Fail Entries reflected less than 4 hours of volunteer experience and/or did not include date/time.
Activity Descriptions 10 %	Outstanding Detailed descriptions of student's activities at the placement were given in each entry.	Proficient Descriptions of student's activities at the placement were given in each entry.	Basic Minimal descriptions of student's activities at the placement were given.	Below Expectations Incomplete and/or incoherent descriptions of the student's activities at the placement were given.	Fail No description of student's activities at the placement were given.
Observations of Client/Agency 10 %	Outstanding Insightful/clear observations about both the client and agency were given in each entry.	Proficient Clear observations about the client and/or agency were given in each entry.	Basic Adequate observations about the client and/or agency were given throughout the journal.	Below Expectations Observations about the client and/or agency were not consistently given throughout the journal.	Fail No observations about the client/agency were given.
Application of Learning 20 %	Outstanding Appropriate and detailed application of at least 2 ideas/terms from the course were made in each entry. Application included an analysis of the concepts.	Proficient Application of 2 ideas/terms from the course was applied in each entry. Application included an analysis of the concept.	Basic Application of at least 1 idea/term from the course was applied in each entry, but included no analysis of the concept.	Below Expectations Application of terms was inconsistent and/or incorrectly used throughout the journal.	Fail There was no application of any terms from the course.
Brief Paper #5 10 %	Outstanding Brief Paper #5 was present.	Proficient --------	Basic --------	Below Expectations --------	Fail Brief Paper #5 was absent.
Summary Paragraph 20 % Depth of Reflection	Outstanding Demonstrated an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of the placement experience. Responses showed strong evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.	Proficient Demonstrated a general reflection on, and personalization of the placement experience. Responses showed evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.	Basic Demonstrated a minimal reflection on, and personalization of the placement experience. Responses showed little evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.	Below Expectations Demonstrated a lack of reflection on, or personalization of the placement experience. Responses showed no evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.	Fail No summary paragraph was provided.
Structure 10 %	Outstanding Writing was clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts were expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Few, if any , minor errors in sentence construction, usage, grammar, or mechanics.	Proficient Writing was mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts were expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There were some minor errors in sentence construction, usage, grammar, or mechanics. These errors did not detract from the clarity of the writing.	Basic Writing was unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts were not expressed in a logical manner. There was a moderate number of spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the responses that may or may not have detracted from the clarity of the writing.	Below Expectations Writing was unclear and disorganized. Thoughts rambled and made little sense. There were numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the responses that impeded the reader.	Fail Writing was incoherent.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Health rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n58