Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Socratic Seminar rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Socratic Seminar
Socratic Seminar
Rubric Code:
W2W2AW3
By
mscodell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Socratic Seminar
Missing
(N/A)
Developing
(N/A)
Proficiency
(N/A)
Mastery
(N/A)
Conduct and Respect
5 %
Missing
Student either does not share at all or uses disrespectful language throughout the discussion, and/or interrupts others several times. Talking style is argumentative and rude.
Developing
Student participates verbally but sometimes uses disrespectful language and interrupts others at least twice. Student shows impatience with the seminar process, and may make insightful comments but does so sparingly and is relatively detached from the conversation at times. May be argumentative and confrontational as opposed to evaluative and analytical.
Proficiency
Student demonstrates respect for the learning process by using respectful language the majority of the time and sharing the floor appropriately most of the time; may have interrupted once; shows composure but sometimes show slight impatience with others; Does not involve others.
Mastery
Student demonstrates respect for the learning process by using respectful language throughout the seminar and sharing the floor appropriately by not interrupting others. Student exhibits patience when confronted with differing opinions, and asks peers for clarifications when relevant. Attempts to involve others into the conversation.
Discussion Skills
5 %
Missing
Needs prompting to get involved; reluctant to speak; does not pay attention when others are sharing; does not listen well to understand others' points; takes no notes; may not have their book with them.
Developing
Participates through active listening but needs prompting to get involved; speaks directly to teacher instead of peers; makes points but points are not sustainable for dialogue with peers; takes very limited notes if any; easily distracted or may be source of distraction; does not look up the text as it is cited
Proficiency
Participates fully; does not need prompting to get involved; listens to others and shares thoughts with classmates, usually directing comments to peers instead of the teacher. Attempts to move discussion to new ideas and avoids speaking too long; takes some notes while others share and looks up the book as it is cited; responds thoughtfully to ideas/questions raised
Mastery
Participates fully and listens actively to others as they spoke, encourages others to share their input, and disagrees with others in a civil manner. Speaks directly to other students rather than the teacher. Student avoids talking for too long and articulates his/herself clearly; overcomes distractions during seminar and avoids repetitive remarks; takes notes as others share and looks up the book as it is cited.
Reasoning and Supporting Evidence
5 %
Missing
No textual evidence or irrelevant evidence was given to support opinions and ideas; comments made are illogical; says no more besides "I agree," ignores previous comments and seminar direction.
Developing
Some opinions and ideas were supported by relevant evidence from the text; tries to make connections between ideas, but was inaccurate; may have read text but reasoning is not always supported by evidence from the text; may overlook important points thus leading to faulty logic;
contributes opinions without textual support.
Proficiency
Most opinions and ideas were supported by relevant evidence from the text; makes some connections between ideas; demonstrates some reflection of questions but not mastery; makes limited connections with others' ideas.
Mastery
All opinions and thoughts were supported by relevant evidence from the text; student makes connections between ideas to themselves, other texts, and the world; student demonstrates understanding of questions; considers all perspectives and resolves contradictory ideas.
Preparation
5 %
Missing
Exhibits little evidence of preparation for discussion; does not demonstrate understanding of the major concepts; does not have discussion question responses prepared
Developing
Somewhat prepared for the discussion; somewhat familiar with text; understands some of the major concepts; Notes prepared are surface level or unoriginal.
Proficiency
Prepared for the discussion; familiar with text; understands most major concepts; Notes prepared are thorough and cover every question asked.
Mastery
Clearly prepared for the discussion; familiar with text, understands major concepts, notes prepared are thorough, arguable, and cover every question asked.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Reading
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.