Skip to main content

iRubric: The Roaring 20s rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The Roaring 20s 
The Roaring 20s
Rubric Code: W233CXC
By Crusader2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Excellent

5 pts

Great

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Presentation/Graphics

Excellent

All slides are attractive. Text is easy to read. More than half of the slides use graphics and effects to enhance presentation.
Great

Slides are attractive. Text is easy to read. Half of the slides use graphics and effects to enhance presentation.
Good

Slides are easy to read. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects.
Fair

The slides are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There is little use of graphics or effects.
Poor

The slides are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great or too little for the space provided. There is little or no use of graphics or effects.
Content

Excellent

All information is accurate and follows all project requirements. Information is paraphrased. Students demonstrate a strong understanding of content.
Great

Most information is accurate and follows most project requirements. Information is paraphrased. Students demonstrate an understanding of content.
Good

Some of the information is accurate and follows some of the project requirements. Information may be paraphrased. Students demonstrate some understanding of content.
Fair

Information is not accurate and does not follow the project requirements. Information is not paraphrased. Students struggle with understanding the content.
Poor

Information is not accurate and does not follow the project requirements. Information is not paraphrased. Students struggle with understanding the content.
Grammar

Excellent

Capitalization and punctuation are correct throughout the presentation. There are no grammatical errors.
Great

There is less than 2 grammatical errors on the presentation.
Good

There are less than 4 grammatical errors on the presentation.
Fair

There are many (more than 4) grammar or mechanical errors on the presentation.
Poor

There are too many grammar or mechanical errors on the presentation.
Use of Class Time

Excellent

Used time well during the class period. Focused on getting the product done. Never distracted others.
Great

Used time well during the class period. Usually focused on getting the project done and never distracted others.
Good

Used some of the class time well during the class period. There was some focus on getting the project done but occasionally distracted others.
Fair

Minimally used class time to focus on project OR distracted others. Reminders were given.
Poor

Did not use class time to focus on project or repeatedly distracted others. Reminders were given and ignored.
Organization of slides

Excellent

Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It follows all of the project guidelines for organization. The audience is able to follow the presentation easily.
Great

Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. It follows most of the project guidelines for organization. The audience is able to follow most of the presentation.
Good

Some information is logically sequenced. Some of the project guidelines are missing. The audience is able to follow some of the presentation.
Fair

There is no clear plan for the organization of information. There are several project guidelines for organization missing. The audience finds it difficult to follow the presentation.
Poor

There is no cooperative plan created and presentation is haphazardly arranged and detracted from the presentation.
Oral Presentation

Excellent

-Students take on the role of scientific advisors.
-All students speak and transitions are smooth.
-Presentation is well rehearsed.
-Audience is engaged.
Great

-Students report information.
-All students speak.
-Presentation is rehearsed.
-Audience is engaged most of the time.
Good

-Students report information.
-Not all students share in the presentation.
-Presentation is not rehearsed.
-Audience is disengaged,
Fair

-Students do not present the information.
-Students do not participate in the presentation.
Poor

Presentation was not well done and team members did not work cooperatively.
Group Work Process

Excellent

-Students establish
fair roles and
responsibilities quickly.
-Students always use respectful language to communicate with others.
-Students solve problems within their group quickly and fairly.
-Students always share workload and support teammates.
Great

-Students establish roles and responsibilities.
-Students sometimes use respectful language to communicate with others.
-Students solve problems within their group.
-Students sometime share workload and support teammates.
Good

-Students establish roles that are imbalanced.
-Students need support and guidance with the way they speak to one another.
-Students need support and guidance solving simple group problems.
-Students need support to share workload or support teammates.
Fair

-Students do not establish roles.
-Students do not speak to one another in a respectful or appropriate way.
-Students cannot solve simple group problems.
-Students do not share workload or support teammates.
Poor

There was no effort made to establish roles for this project and the class did not support each other during the project.
Team Contribution

Excellent

Teammates worked together to create a presentation that went above and beyond the basic criteria given for the project. Their contribution helped raise the class presentation to an awesome level. An awesome and creative effort way shown by everyone on the team!
Great

Teammates worked together to create a presentation that met all the criteria and their contribution adds greatly to the class presentation. Great effort and creativity was shown by everyone on the team!
Good

Teammates worked together to create a presentation that met all the criteria and their contribution adds to the class presentation in a very basic way. Minimal effort and creativity was shown by everyone on the team.
Fair

Teammates did not work together to create a presentation that met all the criteria and their contribution did not add to the class presentation in a positive way.
Poor

The team did not work well together and their presentation was incomplete and could not be used in the class presentation.



Keywords:
  • Google presentation Rubric



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58