Skip to main content
iRubric: Literature Review Rubric: Biomedical Science

iRubric: Literature Review Rubric: Biomedical Science

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literature Review Rubric: Biomedical Science 
Literature Review Rubric
Rubric to grade students Literature Review
Rubric Code: VX6BCWC
By TinaBGibson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Literature Review
  Below Expectation

65 pts

Approaches Expectation

78 pts

Meets Expectation

88 pts

Above Expectation

100 pts

Standards

Science standards

(N/A)

Assignment basics
20 %

Articles: 10 articles minimum
Below Expectation

Information is gathered from a single source; one or less research-based journals used.
Approaches Expectation

Information is gathered from a limited number of sources. Two research journals cited.
Meets Expectation

Information is gathered from three research-based journals.
Above Expectation

Information is gathered from multiple (more than four), research-based sources.
Standards

Provide a historical account or background of the development of the theory or research project review. Write the review so that theoretical knowledge and empirical research is advanced, and that there is an overall contribution to the field's theory, research, and clinical practice.
Summary
15 %

Theme
Below Expectation

No organization, sequencing, or structure to the literature review.
Approaches Expectation

Weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure to the literature review.
Meets Expectation

Well-organized theme but demonstrates illogical sequencing or structure.
Above Expectation

Well organized, demonstrates logical sequencing and structure.
Standards

Propose new research paradigms or testable hypotheses that advance future research.
Summary
25 %

Background/Foundation
Below Expectation

No conclusion are made from the evidence offered.
Approaches Expectation

There are few indications of conclusions from the evidence offered. Student displays limited information regarding the reviewed literature.
Meets Expectation

Conclusions are reached from the evidence offered. Student displays basic information regarding the reviewed literature.
Above Expectation

Detailed and thorough conclusions are reached from the evidence offered. Student displays a consistent understanding of the reviewed literature.
Standards

Discuss the methodological diversity of studies reported in the literature review and the implications of this diversity for new knowledge or future research
Summary
20 %

Research Question
Below Expectation

Research question(s) were not formed and are not apparent within the literature review.
Approaches Expectation

Research question(s) were not formed but could be understood through the literature review.
Meets Expectation

Research question(s) are formed and placed throughout the literature review.
Above Expectation

Research question(s) are formed and clearly stated and defined at the beginning of the literature review.
Standards

Raise provocative and innovative questions on the topic not discussed before in the literature.
Presentation
10 %

Length: 700 minimum
Below Expectation

Does not meet the word count criteria by 100 words or more.
Approaches Expectation

Does not meet the word count criteria by 66 - 99 words.
Meets Expectation

Meets the word count count criteria within 65 words.
Above Expectation

Adheres or exceeds the word count criteria of 500 (std) or 700 (honors).
Standards

Include many "take home messages" (Sternberg, 1991) that generate new theories and empirical research.
Grammar and Typing Errors
10 %

Uses Spell check and check for grammar errors. 3rd person presentation
Below Expectation

There are 4 or more grammatical or typing errors. Student did not adhere to the 3rd person format.
Approaches Expectation

There are 3 grammatical or typing errors. Student used the 3rd person format.
Meets Expectation

There are 2 grammatical or typing errors. Student used the 3rd person format.
Above Expectation

There is one (1) or less grammatical or typing errors. Student used the 3rd person format.
Standards

Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently, using science appropriate terms and concepts.



Keywords:
  • research project



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98