iRubric: Lewis and Clark Game project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Lewis and Clark Game project

Students must create a monopoly game that reflects what they have learned in class concerning Lewis and Clark and the LA Territory.

Rubric Code: V23WBA

By gyusmc86

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Lewis and Clark Monopoly Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Value (N/A)
Explanation Project requires a set of rules for the game.	Poor Misses key elements.	Fair Explanation is unclear.	Good Good solid responses with a detailed explanation.	Excellent A complete response with a detailed explanation.	Value
Demonstrated Knowledge Students need to show understaning of what was talked about in class to relate ideas into the monopoly game.	Poor Response shows a complete lack of understanding for the project.	Fair Response shows some understanding of the project.	Good Shows substantial understanding of the project, ideas, and processes.	Excellent Shows complete understanding of the project, ideas, and processes.	Value
Requirements Students include a minimum of 20 ideas from the unit topics that were discussed in class and incorporate them into the game.	Poor Does not meet the requirements of the project.	Fair Hardly meets the requirements of the project.	Good Meets the requirements of the project.	Excellent Goes beyond the requirements of the project.	Value
Elements of Design Colorful and easy to read. Neatly done	Poor The student did the minimum or the project was not complete.	Fair The student did the assignment in a satisfacotry manner, but lack of planning was evident.	Good The project shows that the student applied the principles discussed in class adequately.	Excellent The project shows that the student applied the principles discussed in class in a unique manner.	Value
Creativity Fun and exciting!	Poor The project shows little or no evidence of original thought.	Fair The students work lacked originality.	Good The students work demonstrates originality.	Excellent The students work demonstrates a unique level of originality	Value
Effort Students must work cooperatively as a group and show individual effort.	Poor The student did not work well with others and showed little to no individual effort	Fair The student was not disruptive but showed little group or individual effort.	Good The student worked well with others and showed individual effort.	Excellent The student worked extremely well with others and gave an effort beyond the requirements of the project.	Value