iRubric: HAP Project Rubric 2013

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

HAP Project Rubric 2013

This rubric will be used to grade your in-class projects in HAP during our May time period while the seniors are away on their senior projects

Rubric Code: UAXA46

By juculley

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Biology

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Proposal	Poor Proposal is not well-organized and may or may not be typed. There is little detail written with regards to specific learning objectives, timeline and calendar. Objectives may not be realistic given the timeframe involved	Fair Proposal is typed and organized. The learning objectives have a fair amount of detail but may not be measurable. The timeline and calendar for project are outlined in general but could use more detail. Objectives are mostly realistic given the timeframe.	Good Proposal is typed and well-organized. Learning objectives are detailed and measurable. The timeline and calendar for the project are outlined in detail and learning objectives are realistic given the timeframe
Class Time	Poor Class time is not very well spent with time wasted or not focused on the project.	Fair Class time is mostly well spent and not wasted. Time is focused on the project.	Good There is no wasted class time and time is well spent and focused on the project.
Out of Class Time	Poor Out of class time is not very well spent or there is not enough accomplished out of class to keep on schedule with project. Little evidence of focused task accomplishment for homework.	Fair Out of class time is spent fairly well. Schedule is mostly kept to with outside accomplishments. Some good evidence of task accomplishment for homework.	Good Out of class time is spent very well and schedule of project is kept to. Homework accomplishments are in evidence.
Final Product	Poor Final product representing work on project is of sub-standard quality or lacking in professionalism. Product is disorganized and/or not comprehensive enough to represent learning objectives. Product is not of appropriate length.	Fair Final product is of decent quality but may need a little work with regards to professionalism. Product is fairly well organized, but could use some work in this regard. Product represents learning objectives reasonably well and is of decent length.	Good Final product is of high quality and is professional. Product is well organized and represents all learning objectives in detail. Product is of appropriate length.
Personal Meaning	Poor Topic chosen is of marginal relevance to personal interest or may show evidence of being chosen at random. There is little evidence of passion on the part of the learner for the topic chosen.	Fair Topic chosen is relevant to personal interest and was not chosen at random. Some evidence of passion on the part of the learner for topic chosen	Good Topic chosen is extremely relevant to personal interest and was not chosen at random. Obvious evidence of passion on the part of the learner towards the chosen topic.
Resources	Poor Few resources are used. Those used are referenced poorly or not at all in final product. Obvious need for more and/or more varied resources for topic chosen	Fair Fair number of resources are used and those used are referenced. Reference format may need work. There may be a need for additional resources or types of resources given the topic chosen	Good Resources used are of sufficient quantity and variety to address chosen question. Resources used are referenced in proper format in final product.

Subjects:

Biology

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric