iRubric: Mexican History Project Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mexican History Project Rubric

Fieldwalking Rubric

Some classwork assignments that will be given will be graded by this rubric.

Rubric Code: UA88A7

By MsHeidi

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Project Rubric
	Poor 0.5 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 1.5 pts	Excellent 2 pts
Use of time.	Poor Student managed time poorly. Did not follow assignment. Disruptive.	Fair Limited evidence of time management. Half of the work is finished.	Good The assignment is completed. Good time management.	Excellent Assignment is complete and submitted on time. Managed time very well.
Proper sentence structure; neatness	Poor Poor sentence structure. Many run-on sentences. Thoughts are not clear and evident.	Fair Some evidence of good sentence structure. Able to understand intent. Some run-on sentences.	Good Good sentence structure. A couple of run-on sentences. Thoughts are clear.	Excellent Good sentence structure. Thoughts are clear. Good flow between sentences. No run-on sentences.
Check for accuracy	Poor No evidence of proof-reading your work. Words are poorly spelled. Writing appears hurried.	Fair Some evidence of proof-reading. Some words are properly spelled. Work is somewhat legible.	Good No more than 4 spelling errors. Work is legible. Evidence of proof-reading. Work is neat.	Excellent Proper demonstration of writing skills. Work is neat.
Content	Poor Less than half of the facts about topic were provided.	Fair Half of the facts about topic were provided.	Good More than half the facts about topic were provided.	Excellent Almost all the facts about topic were provided.
Use of sources	Poor Used very little information. Article analysis completed for one source.	Fair Used information from two sources. Article analysis competed for 2 sources.	Good Used a fair amount of information from two of sources, little from the third source. Article analysis competed for 3 sources.	Excellent Used sufficient information from all three sources. Article analysis competed for 3 sources.