- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: AR 104 Architecture Project I Assessment rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
AR 104 Architecture Project I Assessment AR 107 Architecture Project II Assessment A guideline that properly evaluates the design process. It measures the various phases and approaches that are necessary in the assessment of a project. Rubric Code: U98ABX By LzWong Draft Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

AR 104 100 % Architecture Project I
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Average 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Mini Assignment 20 % Light Fixtures
Creativity 5 % Level usage of Eco-Friendly Materials	Excellent Fully utilized (>80%)	Good Mostly utilized (>60%-80%)	Average Partially utilized (>40%-60%)	Fair Utilized some only (>20%-40%)	Poor Little/ No eco-friendly material used (0%-20%)
Workmanship 5 % Aesthetic Value of Product	Excellent Very High aesthetic value- optimum (>80%) tidiness & cleanliness with the use of tools is effective.	Good High aesthetic value - >60%- 80% tidiness & cleanliness with the use of tools is good.	Average Medium aesthetic value - moderate (>40%-60%) tidiness & cleanliness with the use of tools is moderately effective	Fair Low aesthetic value – messy & dirty with the use of tools is ineffective	Poor No aesthetic value – no presentable without the use of tools.
Product Communication 5 % Form & Function base design	Excellent A brand new design which do not follows the traditional ways of design & no sample found in market. Lighting effect shows exactly same with the form.	Good A design which do not follows the traditional ways of design but found similar example in market (form). Lighting effect synchronize mostly with the form.	Average Final design shows mixture of conventional + contemporary ideas. Lighting effect synchronize some with the form.	Fair Final design shows copied of contemporary design in market. Lighting effect synchronize little with the form.	Poor Conventional design. Lighting effects do not synchronize with the form.
Proportion & Scale 5 % Understanding of Micro Architecture	Excellent The product design shows perfect scale which easy to move & carry.	Good The product design shows good scale which consider easy to move & carry.	Average The product design shows moderate scale which not easy to move & carry.	Fair The product design shows off scale which is hard to move & carry.	Poor The product design shows big scale which is can't move & carry.
Assignment 1 20 % Site Analysis
Data Collection 5 % Completeness of relevant data collected.	Excellent The report shows a clear attention to collect completely the relevant data.	Good The report shows a good attention to collect most of the relevant data.	Average The report shows an average attention to collect some relevant data.	Fair The report shows a little attention to collect the relevant data.	Poor The report do not shows any attention to collect data & it's not relevant.
Undestanding 5 % Understanding level of site context.	Excellent Understanding of history & development of the site is clearly demonstrated.	Good Understanding of history & development of the site is mostly demonstrated.	Average Understanding of history & development of the site is demonstrated some.	Fair Understanding of history & development of the site is little.	Poor No understanding of the site is demonstrated.
Analyzing 5 % Level of analyzing with data collected	Excellent The report shows outstanding analysis skills, exp SWOT analysis in demonstrating the data analyzing and it's completely done.	Good The report shows a good skills of analysis in demonstrating the data analyzing and it's being analyzed mostly.	Average The report shows average skills of analysis in demonstrating the data analyzing and it's partially analyzed.	Fair The report shows minimal skills of analysis in demonstrating the data analyzing and only little data is being analyzed.	Poor The report shows none of the analysis skills in demonstrating the data analyzing & it's not undergoes analysis process.
Evaluation 5 % Determination of site's problems & issues, strength & advantages	Excellent The report is planned carefully; evaluate of all history & development to figure out problems & issues, strength & advantages.	Good The report is planned carefully; evaluate most of history & development to figure out problems & issues, strength & advantages.	Average The report is planned adequately; evaluate of some history & development to figure out problems & issues, strength & advantages.	Fair The report is little evidence of evaluation the history & development to figure out problems & issues, strength & advantages.	Poor The report shows no evaluation of history & development to figure out problems & issues, strength & advantages.
Assignment 2 20 % Design Proposal
Ideas 5 % Inventiveness, ideas expression within scope of Biomimicry	Excellent The ideas demonstrate original personal expression.	Good The ideas demonstrate mostly personal expression.	Average The ideas demonstrate an average amount of personal expression.	Fair The ideas demonstrate little amount of personal expression.	Poor The ideas lack evidence of personal expression.
Idea development 5 % Understanding & advancement development of Biomimicry	Excellent Students shows an outstanding of ideas development in advance which able to design up to level 3 of Biomimicry context.	Good Students shows a good ideas development in advance which able to design up to level 3 with a little confusing sense of Biomimicry context.	Average Students shows an average of ideas development in advance which able to design up to level 2 of Biomimicry context.	Fair Students shows some ideas development in advance which able to design up to level 2 with a lots of confusing of Biomimicry context.	Poor Students only able to design up to level 1 of Biomimicry context.
Form & Function 5 % Integration of ideas into form & function	Excellent Student able to show a clear images of how the ideas being integrates into form & function with necessary design tactics.	Good Student able to show images of how the ideas being integrates into form & function with most design tactics.	Average Student shows adequate number of images of how the ideas being integrates into form & function with some design tactics.	Fair Student shows few images of how the ideas being integrates into form & function with little design tactics.	Poor Lack of images to show how the ideas being integrates into form & function with no design tactics.
Circulation 5 % How does a design able to be circulated at site.	Excellent The circulation of the proposed design is perfectly designed with all problems solved.	Good The circulation of the proposed design is well- designed with minor problems existed.	Average The circulation of the proposed design is designed but major problems still not solved.	Fair The circulation of the proposed design is bad because a lots of problems not solved.	Poor No circulation is designed and just maintain existing at site.
Assignment 2 40 % Final Design Proposal
Oral Presentation 5 % The skills to test student's oral communication	Excellent Student demonstrates an outstanding oral communication to present his/her design.	Good Student demonstrates a good oral communication to present his/her design.	Average Student demonstrates an average oral communication to present his/her design.	Fair Student demonstrates a poor oral communication to present his/her design.	Poor Student could not present his/her design.
Drawings 5 % Provided with all necessary drawings	Excellent Presentation boards show complete set of necessary technical architectural drawings; location plan, site plan, floor plan/s, >3 elevation (excluding repeat elevation), 1 section & 1 3D illustration	Good Presentation boards show most of necessary technical architectural drawings with 1 drawing missing; exp: site plan, section and etc.	Average Presentation boards show some of necessary technical architectural drawings with 2-3 drawings missing.	Fair Presentation boards show few technical architectural drawings with 4-6 drawings missing.	Poor Presentation boards lack of technical architectural drawings with 7-8 drawings missing.
Line Quality 5 % Line Types & Thickness	Excellent Student produce the technical drawings with all correct used of line types & thickness to present the idea & design.	Good Student produce the technical drawings with correct used of most line types & thickness to present the idea & design.	Average Student produce the technical drawings with moderate correct used of line types & thickness to present the idea & design.	Fair Student produce the technical drawings with minimum correct used of line types & thickness to present the idea & design.	Poor The line types & thickness used are all wrong through technical drawings shown.
Wording & Rendering 5 % Examine the Architecture Writing & coloring skills	Excellent Student could present 80% with correct skills of architecture writing & coloring on final presentation boards.	Good Student could present 60% with correct architecture writing & coloring skills on final presentation boards.	Average Student could present 40% with architecture writing & coloring skills on final presentation boards.	Fair Student could present 20% only with architecture writing & coloring skills on final presentation boards.	Poor Student couldn't perform with architecture writing & coloring skills on final presentation boards.
Model 5 % i. Tidiness	Excellent The model shows an outstanding cutting skills which 80%-100% considers neat & tidy.	Good The model shows a good cutting skills which 60%-80% considers neat & tidy.	Average The model shows an average cutting skills which 40%-60% considers neat & tidy.	Fair The model shows cutting skills which 20%-40% considers neat & tidy.	Poor The model shows a bad cutting skills which 0%-20% considers neat & tidy.
5 % ii. Cleanliness	Excellent The model shows an outstanding gluing skills which 80%-100% considers clean & clear.	Good The model shows a good gluing skills which 60%-80% considers clean & clear.	Average The model shows average gluing skills which 40%-60% considers clean & clear.	Fair The model shows a gluing skills which 20%-40% considers clean & clear.	Poor The model shows bad gluing skills which 0%-20% considers clean & clear.
5 % iii. Idea reflection	Excellent Model is able to perfectly present the idea of design.	Good Model is able to present well the idea of design.	Average Model is able to present the idea of design.	Fair Model is bad to present the idea of design.	Poor Model couldn't presents the idea of design.

Keywords:

Concept, Design, Proposed, Work

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric