Skip to main content
iRubric: AR 107 Architecture Project II Assessment rubric

iRubric: AR 107 Architecture Project II Assessment rubric

 
find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
AR 107 Architecture Project II Assessment 
A guideline that properly evaluates the design process. It measures the various phases and approaches that are necessary in the assessment of a project.
Rubric Code: V987BB
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12


Powered by iRubric AR 107
Architecture Project II
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Assignment 1
10 % Precedence Study
Understanding of Context
5 %

Level of understanding of technical, historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach.

Excellent

The report is planned carefully; understanding of all historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach is clearly demonstrated.
Good

The report is planned carefully; understanding of most historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach is mostly demonstrated.
Average

The report is planned adequately; understanding of some historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and some design approach demonstrated.
Fair

The report shows little evidence of understanding the historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach.
Poor

The report shows no understanding of the historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach.
Site Analysis
5 %

Technical skills to prepare a comprehensive report.

Excellent

The report shows outstanding technical skills,with clear attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.
Good

The report shows good technical skills, with most attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.
Average

The report shows average technical skills with average attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.
Fair

The report shows minimal technical skills with little attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.
Poor

The report shows no technical skills with no attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.
Assignment 2
30 % Conceptual Development
Parti
10 %

Inventiveness, expression of ideas.

Excellent

The ideas demonstrate original personal expression.
Good

The ideas demonstrate some personal expression.
Average

The ideas demonstrate an average amount of personal expression.
Fair

The ideas demonstrate little personal expression.
Poor

The ideas lacks evidence of personal expression.
Ideas Development
5 %

Advancement of ideas developed through design tactics.

Excellent

Student demonstrates an outstanding design tactics with full understanding of idea, and develop successfully.
Good

Student demonstrates a good design tactics with most understanding of idea, and develop well.
Average

Student demonstrates an average design tactics with some understanding of idea, and develop partially.
Fair

Student demonstrates a poor design tactics with little understanding of idea, and develop least.
Poor

Student does not demonstrates any design tactics with no understanding of idea, and development.
Function & Circulation
5 %

Level of transformation of concept into function & circulation of the design

Excellent

The transformation process of concept to function & circulation is clearly demonstrated.
Good

The transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.
Average

Some transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.
Fair

Little transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.
Poor

No transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.
Form & Space
5 %

Integration of form, space, function & circulation

Excellent

The student shows an outstanding design with a clear integration of form, space, function & circulation.
Good

The student shows a good design with integration of form, space, function & circulation.
Average

The student shows an average design with some integration of form, space, function & circulation.
Fair

The student shows a poor design with little integration of form, space, function & circulation.
Poor

The student shows very poor design without any integration of form, space, function & circulation.
Diagram & Sketches
5 %

Ability of student to presents the idea & design with paper.

Excellent

Student was able to presents the idea & design with paper clearly.
Good

Student was good to presents the idea & design with paper.
Average

Student was able to presents the idea & design with paper averagely.
Fair

Student was poor to presents the idea & design with paper.
Poor

Student was unable to presents the idea & design with paper averagely.
Assignment 3
20 % Sketch Design Proposal
Site Plan
5 %

Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture

Excellent

Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Good

Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Average

Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Fair

Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Poor

Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Plans
5 %

Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture

Excellent

Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Good

Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Average

Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Fair

Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Poor

Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Elevations
5 %

Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture

Excellent

Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Good

Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Average

Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Fair

Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Poor

Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Sections
5 %

Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture

Excellent

Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Good

Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Average

Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Fair

Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Poor

Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Assignment 4
40 % Final Design Proposal
Oral Presentation
5 %

The skills to test student's oral communication

Excellent

Student demonstrates an outstanding oral communication to present his/her design.
Good

Student demonstrates a good oral communication present his/her design.
Average

Student demonstrates an average oral communication present his/her design.
Fair

Student demonstrates a poor oral communication present his/her design.
Poor

Student could not present his/her design.
Presentation Boards
5 %

i. Parti - Main concept presents

Excellent

The parti is successfully developed with understanding of all theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is clearly demonstrated.
Good

The parti is well developed with understanding of most theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is demonstrated.
Average

The parti is averagely developed with understanding of some theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is partially demonstrated.
Fair

The parti is poor developed with understanding of little theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is demonstrated least.
Poor

The parti does not shows any development with no understanding of theoretical study; no critically respond to sites' context and design approach are demonstrated.

5 %

ii. Drawings

Excellent

Student shows an outstanding technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.
Good

Student shows a good technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.
Average

Student shows an average technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.
Fair

Student shows a poor technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.
Poor

Student could not shows technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.

5 %

iii. Material & Detailing

Excellent

Understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is clearly demonstrated.
Good

Understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is demonstrated.
Average

Understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is mostly demonstrated.
Fair

Little understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is demonstrated.
Poor

No understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is demonstrated.

5 %

iv. Format & Technique

Excellent

An outstanding of graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.
Good

A good graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.
Average

An average of graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.
Fair

A poor graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.
Poor

No graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.
Model
10 %

i. Model Making Skill
- tidiness
- cleanliness

Excellent

Model produced shows an outstanding product at final presentation.
Good

Model produced shows a good product at final presentation.
Average

Model produced shows an average product at final presentation.
Fair

Model produced shows a poor product at final presentation.
Poor

Model produced shows a very poor product at final presentation.
Overall Presentation
5 %

Oral, boards, attire, personal characters

Excellent

Overall presentation is outstanding.
Good

Overall presentation is good.
Average

Overall presentation is average.
Fair

Overall presentation is poor.
Poor

Overall presentation is very poor.



Keywords:
  • Parti, Design, Proposed, Work







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2021 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n109