Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Facilty Plan Paper rubric

iRubric: Facilty Plan Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Facilty Plan Paper Facilty Plan Presentation Final Facility Plan Paper Rubric Code: U2W7563 By jdovel Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Philosophy Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Facility Plan
	Poor 15 pts	Fair 19 pts	Good 22 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Paper mechanics/APA	Poor The paper does not utilize the provided APA template. Paper has numerous issues with readability, understand ability and flow. Paper has numerous issues with spelling, grammar or paragraph structure.	Fair The paper has several issues with utilizing the provided APA template. Paper has several issues with readability, understand ability and flow. Paper has several issues with spelling, grammar or paragraph structure.	Good The paper has 1-2 issues with utilizing the provided APA template. Paper has 1-2 issues with readability, understand ability and flow. Paper has 1-2 issues with spelling, grammar or paragraph structure.	Excellent The paper properly utilizes the provided APA template. Paper has excellent readability, understand ability and flow. Paper contains no issues with spelling, grammar or paragraph structure.
Facility Description	Poor Presentation does not include adequate facility description.	Fair Presentation has numerous shortcomings in the facility description.	Good Presentation has 1-2 shortcomings in the facility description.	Excellent Presentation clearly describes the facility with the use of graphics, pictures, maps and clear explanations.
Facility need/problem filled.	Poor No viable explanation of how the facility fits into the market to include how the facility will be successful.	Fair Average explanation of how the facility fits into the market to include how the facility will be successful.	Good Proficient explanation of how the facility fits into the market to include how the facility will be successful.	Excellent Exceptional explanation of how the facility fits into the market to include how the facility will be successful.
Site selection	Poor No viable explanation of how the facility site is the right choice and why its location will drive success.	Fair Average explanation of how the facility site is the right choice and why its location will drive success.	Good Proficient explanation of how the facility site is the right choice and why its location will drive success.	Excellent Exceptional explanation of how the facility site is the right choice and why its location will drive success.
Design, implementation, contracting	Poor No viable explanation of how the plan addresses excellent design, implementation and contracting to ensure successful completion.	Fair Average explanation of how the plan addresses excellent design, implementation and contracting to ensure successful completion.	Good Proficient explanation of how the plan addresses excellent design, implementation and contracting to ensure successful completion.	Excellent Exceptional explanation of how the plan addresses excellent design, implementation and contracting to ensure successful completion.
Project feasibility	Poor No viable summer of how the project is feasible from the technical, operational and financial perspectives.	Fair Average summary of how the project is feasible from the technical, operational and financial perspectives.	Good Proficient summary of how the project is feasible from the technical, operational and financial perspectives.	Excellent Exceptional summary of how the project is feasible from the technical, operational and financial perspectives.
Synthesis	Poor Lack of development of clear criteria derived from the facility plan.	Fair More details, analysis, research, critical thought needed in this area.	Good Proficient analysis of the facility plan and clear articulation of how the theory led to criteria.	Excellent Exceptional insight into the facility plan as exemplified through analysis and presentation.
Completeness / Length	Poor Lack of critical or analytical thought and little to no insight utilized. Paper does not serve the purpose outlined in this assignment.	Fair More details, insight, and critical thought needed. Paper significantly under requirements.	Good Proficient critical analysis of issue and impact using many details and evidence. Moderate insight into issue. Paper slightly under requirements.	Excellent Exceptional insight into critical components & analysis of issue. Paper length is 10 -15 pages double spaced text components.

Keywords:

case study, oral presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Business rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16