Skip to main content
iRubric: Cell Podcast rubric

iRubric: Cell Podcast rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Cell Podcast 
Podcast I
This podcast focuses on content & evaluation. Cell organelle structure and function are discussed in detail, along with current research.
Rubric Code: U275A7
By laneyk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Content & Evaluation
  Cell Biologist

4 pts

Lab Rat

3 pts

Hard "Cell"

2 pts

Rookie

1 pts

Introduction
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Catchy and clever introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately.
Lab Rat

Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.
Hard "Cell"

Somewhat engaging and provides a vague purpose.
Rookie

Irrelevant or minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear.
Content
4 pts

Cell Biologist

Demonstrates a full understanding of the topic. Creativity and original content enhance the purpose of the podcast in an innovative way. Accurate information is provided succinctly. Keeps focus on the topic. Both structure and function of cell organelle discussed in detail.
Lab Rat

Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic. Accurate information is provided succinctly. Stays on the topic. Both structure and function of cell organelle discussed in some detail.
Hard "Cell"

Demonstrates a good understanding of some of the topic. Some information is inaccurate or long-winded. Occasionally strays from the topic. Both structure and function of cell organelle are discussed with minimal detail.
Rookie

Does not show understanding of the topic or information is inaccurate. Does not stay on topic. Either structure or function is not discussed.
Vocabulary
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Vocabulary enhances content. All words pronounced and spelled correctly.
Lab Rat

Vocabulary is appropriate. At least one term is mispronounced/misspelled.
Hard "Cell"

Vocabulary is adequate. 3 or more terms are mispronounced/misspelled.
Rookie

Vocabulary is inappropriate for the audience. 5 or more terms are mispronounced/misspelled.
Authority
2 pts

Cell Biologist

Includes a wide variety of appropriate, well-researched and informative sources and has well-edited quotes from "expert" sources. Quotes and information are credited in the correct appropriately.
Lab Rat

Includes appropriate and informative quotes from "expert" sources. Source quotes are credited appropriately.
Hard "Cell"

Includes some variety of informative quotes from some "expert" sources. Source quotes need some editing or some credits are missing.
Rookie

Includes no source quotes.
Interview
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Open ended questions and follow-up are used that draw interesting and relevant information from the interviewee. The interview sounds like a conversation.
Lab Rat

Open ended questions and follow-up questions are used appropriately.
Hard "Cell"

Open ended questions and follow-up questions are occasionally irrelevant to the topic.
Rookie

Only yes or no questions are used. No follow-up questions are asked.
Conclusion
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.
Lab Rat

Conclusion summarizes information.
Hard "Cell"

Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information.
Rookie

No conclusion is provide.
Presentation
2 pts

Cell Biologist

Interesting, well-rehearsed, compelling delivery in a conversational style, grammatically correct, paced well. Highly effective enunciation, expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.
Lab Rat

Relatively interesting, rehearsed, good grammar. Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective.
Hard "Cell"

Choppy delivery, errors in grammar, contents not very compelling. Enunciation, expression, or rhythm are sometimes distracting.
Rookie

Delivery needs improvement. Grammar needs improvement. Content not compelling. Enunciation of spoken word is not clearly understandable or expression, and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.
Graphic Enhancements
2 pts

Cell Biologist

The graphics/artwork used create a unique and effective presentation and enhance what is being said in the podcast and follow the rules for quality graphic design.
Lab Rat

The graphics/artwork relate to the audio and reinforce content and demonstrate functionality.
Hard "Cell"

The graphics/artwork sometimes enhance the quality and understanding of the presentation.
Rookie

The graphics are unrelated to the podcast. Artwork is inappropriate to the podcast.
Music Enhancements
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation. Intro/exit provide good signposts for listening. Music is owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright guidelines followed appropriately.
Lab Rat

Music provides supportive background to the podcast. Intro/exit material present but not effective. Music is owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright guidelines followed appropriately.
Hard "Cell"

Music is present, but is not appropriate for the tone or content of the podcast. Intro/exit material is not present. Use of copyrighted works is questionable.
Rookie

No music or intro/exit materials present or music is distracting to presentation. Copyright infringement obvious.
Technical Production
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Clean and without distraction or extraneous noise. Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.
Lab Rat

Acceptable, but with noticeable background noise or other distractions.
Hard "Cell"

Background noise or other distractions excessive, overall audio below average.
Rookie

Quality unacceptable.
Podcast
1 pts

Cell Biologist

Podcast is very organized and clear and uploaded on time. Segment is 5-7 minutes long.
Lab Rat

Podcast is organized and clear and uploaded on time. Segment is 3-5 minutes long.
Hard "Cell"

Organization needs some work. Segment is 3-5 minutes, but is not turned in on time.
Rookie

There is major issues with organization. Segment is under 3 minutes.



Keywords:
  • content,music,presentation,audio,video



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16