- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Myth Packet rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Myth Packet Myth Connection Project in which students are asked to read myths from the packet and analyze their own connection to each myth or a connection to another story (in any form). Rubric Code: U2347W3 By boogadie Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Project: The Myth Connection
	Exemplary 4 pts	Very Well Done 3 pts	Meets Standards 2 pts	Approaches Standards 1 pts
Connection	Exemplary Student analyzed the myth as it pertains to his or her life. OR Student analyzed the god or goddess in comparison to a modern day superhero. A clear, deep, creative connection to the story/god is established and consistent throughout the essay.	Very Well Done Student analyzed the myth as it pertains to his or her life. OR Student analyzed the god or goddess in comparison to a modern day superhero. A clear, thorough connection to the story/god is established and consistent throughout the essay.	Meets Standards Student analyzed the myth as it pertains to his or her life. OR Student analyzed the god or goddess in comparison to a modern day superhero. A clear connection to the story/god is established and consistent throughout the essay.	Approaches Standards Student analyzed the myth as it pertains to his or her life. OR Student analyzed the god or goddess in comparison to a modern day superhero. A clear, connection to the story/god is established and consistent throughout the essay, but it is weak.
Analysis	Exemplary All of the examples are specific and relevant, and strong explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's points. Answers are consistently detailed and cohesive, as well as creative..	Very Well Done All of the examples are specific and relevant, and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's points. Answers are consistently cohesive.	Meets Standards All of the examples are relevant, but may be lacking specifics. Answers may be cohesive, but may not be consistently so.	Approaches Standards Relevance of evidence may be questionable, and explanations may or may not be detailed and support the author's points.
Conventions	Exemplary Very few to no grammar, punctuation, or style errors. Writing flows, is clear, and formal.	Very Well Done Minor grammar, punctuation, or style errors. Writing is clear and formal.	Meets Standards Errors in grammar, punctuation, or style detracted from clarity. Writing may not be consistently clear or formal.	Approaches Standards Numerous errors in grammar, punctuation, and style that begin to interfere with understanding.