Skip to main content
iRubric: Put It All Together rubric

iRubric: Put It All Together rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Put It All Together 
Oral Presentations
This is the grading rubric for oral presentations for the Put It All Together project involving virtues, Beatitudes, Ten Commandments and the Seven Capital sins
Rubric Code: TXB76WB
By chemaign
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Philosophy  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Exemplary

4 pts

Accomplished

3 pts

Developing

2 pts

Unacceptable

1 pts

Mechanics
Appearance and voice

• Volume – loud enough<BR>
• Clarity – good diction <BR>
• Distractors – very few, if any, ums and ers<BR>
• Good word choice, <BR>
• Good eye contact <BR>
• Appropriately dressed
Exemplary

Meets all six points
Accomplished

Lacks one of the points.
Developing

Lacks two of the points.
Unacceptable

Lacks more than two points.
Presentation

Did the presenters speak clearly (understandably)? <BR>
Was it obvious the material had been rehearsed?
Exemplary

Presenters were all very confident (demonstrated a sense that the presenters knew what they are doing) in delivery. <BR>
Preparation very evident.
Accomplished

Presenters were occasionally confident with their presentation, however the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been. Preparation was evident.
Developing

Presenters were not consistent with the level of confidence and preparedness shown, but had some strong moments. Preparation was somewhat evident.
Unacceptable

Presenters appeared unconfident and demonstrated little evidence of planning prior to presentation.
Presentation

Was the presentation well organized and easy to follow?
Exemplary

Presentation well organized, well prepared, and easy to follow.
Accomplished

Presentation had organizing ideas, but there were a few gaps that made parts difficult to follow.
Developing

Presentation had minimal signs of organization and was difficult to follow as a whole.
Unacceptable

Presentation lacked organization.
Audience Awareness

Did the presenters engage the audience? Are they aware that they may be addressing people who may not be experts?
Exemplary

Presenters did an excellent job of engaging the audience and accurately explained terminology and interconnecting terms.
Accomplished

Presenters engaged the audience, but did not explain all necessary terminology and interconnecting terms.
Developing

Presenters minimally engaged the audience and explained less than 50% of the terminology and interconnecting terms.
Unacceptable

Presenters failed to engage the audience (audience seemed unnecessary to the presentation) and did not explain terminology and interconnecting terms.
Visual presentation

Exemplary

Posters were clear and uncluttered with lettering large enough to be seen. Diagrams and photos clearly labeled.
Accomplished

Posters clear, but contain a few distracting transitions or unnecessary graphics.
Developing

Posters too busy or lettering too small.
Unacceptable

Poorly prepared posters which are hard to read and hard to follow.
Content
Unity

Exemplary

Presentation contains a unifying and controlling purpose, thesis or claim that is organized and maintained throughout the presentation.
Accomplished

Unifying theme is apparent, but is not maintained consistently throughout the presentation
Developing

Unifying theme is vague and minimally maintained throughout the presentation.
Unacceptable

The unifying theme is not apparent.
The story: Purpose

What question are presenters exploring (purpose)?<BR>
Why is this question important (reason)?<BR>
Who could the results affect (clients - who/where)?
Exemplary

The purpose of the project is well defined and a compelling reason is given for it.
Accomplished

The purpose of the project is defined, but the reason for the setup is vague.
Developing

Purpose is loosely defined and no reason is given for the importance of the project.
Unacceptable

Purpose is not defined nor connected to to anything.
The story: Method

How was this question or purpose explored (method)?<BR>
Evidence / development – includes more specific, concrete evidence (or details) than opinion or abstract, general commentary
Exemplary

Shows how the question was explored .
Gives concrete, specific evidence with well thought out ideas based on knowledge learned.
Accomplished

Shows how the question was explored.
Evidence has some concrete aspects, but contains doesn't seem well thought out. Reasons given weren't clear.
Developing

Shows a weak connection to the question and method of exploration.
Evidence has little concrete aspects and couldn't be explained well.
Unacceptable

Does not relate purpose to method.
The story: Outcome

What was the outcome (short results statement)?
Exemplary

Gives a concise results statement. Explains and develops appropriate, logical, and relevant supporting detail and/or evidence in a way that supports presentation topic.
Accomplished

Gives a concise results statement. Some details and evidence are not pertinent to the topic, but there is some development of relevant supporting detail and/or evidence in a way that supports presentation topic.
Developing

Results statement is not apparent.
Some supporting detail and evidence is shared, but is not organized in a way that will enable results to be apparent.
Unacceptable

Presenters do not connect results with original question or purpose.
COLLABORATION
Contribution

Did everyone contribute to the presentation? Did everyone seem well versed in the material?
Exemplary

Teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation.
Accomplished

Teammates worked from others’ ideas most of the time. Appeared that everyone did some work, but only some were carrying the presentation.
Developing

Teammates sometimes worked from others’ ideas. However, it seems as though certain people did not do as much work as others.
Unacceptable

Teammates never worked from others’ ideas. The presentation was carried by one person.
Use of teamwork

Exemplary

Team members transitions organized and seamless
Accomplished

Team member transitions fairly organized
Developing

Transitions somewhat disorganized
Unacceptable

Some team members did not contribute



Keywords:
  • IPC, Oral Presentations



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98