Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Oral Presentations rubric

iRubric: Oral Presentations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Oral Presentations Oral Presentations This is the grading rubric for oral presentations for the Messiah College Integrated Projects Curriculum. Rubric Code: VX869X9 By chemaign Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	Exemplary 4 pts	Accomplished 3 pts	Developing 2 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts
Mechanics
Appearance and voice • Volume – loud enough • Clarity – good diction • Distractors – very few, if any, ums and ers • Good word choice, • Good eye contact • Appropriately dressed	Exemplary Meets all six points	Accomplished Lacks one of the points.	Developing Lacks two of the points.	Unacceptable Lacks more than two points.
Presentation Did the presenters speak clearly (understandably)? Was it obvious the material had been rehearsed?	Exemplary Presenters were all very confident (demonstrated a sense that the presenters knew what they are doing) in delivery. Preparation very evident.	Accomplished Presenters were occasionally confident with their presentation, however the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been. Preparation was evident.	Developing Presenters were not consistent with the level of confidence and preparedness shown, but had some strong moments. Preparation was somewhat evident.	Unacceptable Presenters appeared unconfident and demonstrated little evidence of planning prior to presentation.
Presentation Was the presentation well organized and easy to follow?	Exemplary Presentation well organized, well prepared, and easy to follow.	Accomplished Presentation had organizing ideas, but there were a few gaps that made parts difficult to follow.	Developing Presentation had minimal signs of organization and was difficult to follow as a whole.	Unacceptable Presentation lacked organization.
Audience Awareness Did the presenters engage the audience? Are they aware that they may be addressing people who may not be experts?	Exemplary Presenters did an excellent job of engaging the audience and accurately explained technical jargon and project specific terms.	Accomplished Presenters engaged the audience, but did not explain all necessary technical jargon and project specific terms.	Developing Presenters minimally engaged the audience and explained less than 50% of the technical jargon.	Unacceptable Presenters failed to engage the audience (audience seemed unnecessary to the presentation) and did not explain technical jargon.
Visual presentation	Exemplary Slides clear and uncluttered with lettering large enough to be seen. Diagrams and photos clearly labeled.	Accomplished Slides clear, but contain a few distracting transitions or unnecessary graphics.	Developing Slides too busy or lettering too small.	Unacceptable Poorly prepared slides which are hard to read and hard to follow.
Content
Unity	Exemplary Presentation contains a unifying and controlling purpose, thesis or claim that is organized and maintained throughout the presentation.	Accomplished Unifying theme is apparent, but is not maintained consistently throughout the presentation	Developing Unifying theme is vague and minimally maintained throughout the presentation.	Unacceptable The unifying theme is not apparent.
The story: Purpose What question are presenters exploring (purpose)? Why is this question important (reason)? Who could the results affect (clients - who/where)?	Exemplary The purpose of the project is well defined and a compelling reason is given for it. Those who could benefit from the results are identified and those benefits are described.	Accomplished The purpose of the project is defined, but the reason for completing the project is vague. Those who could benefit from the results are alluded to.	Developing Purpose is loosely defined and no reason is given for the importance of the project.	Unacceptable Purpose is not defined nor connected to application beyond the classroom.
The story: Method How was this question or purpose explored (method)? Evidence / development – includes more specific, concrete evidence (or details) than opinion or abstract, general commentary	Exemplary Shows how the question was explored (connection of project to question). Gives concrete, specific evidence and not just opinion, abstract or general commentary.	Accomplished Shows how the question was explored. Evidence has some concrete aspects, but contains opinion and general commentary.	Developing Shows a weak connection to the question and method of exploration. Evidence has little concrete aspects and is mostly opinion.	Unacceptable Does not relate purpose to method.
The story: Outcome What was the outcome (short results statement)?	Exemplary Gives a concise results statement. Explains and develops appropriate, logical, and relevant supporting detail and/or evidence in a way that supports presentation topic.	Accomplished Gives a concise results statement. Some details and evidence are not pertinent to the topic, but there is some development of relevant supporting detail and/or evidence in a way that supports presentation topic.	Developing Results statement is not apparent. Some supporting detail and evidence is shared, but is not organized in a way that will enable results to be apparent.	Unacceptable Presenters do not connect results with original question or purpose.
COLLABORATION
Contribution Did everyone contribute to the presentation? Did everyone seem well versed in the material?	Exemplary Teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation.	Accomplished Teammates worked from others’ ideas most of the time. Appeared that everyone did some work, but only some were carrying the presentation.	Developing Teammates sometimes worked from others’ ideas. However, it seems as though certain people did not do as much work as others.	Unacceptable Teammates never worked from others’ ideas. The presentation was carried by one person.
Use of teamwork	Exemplary Team members transitions organized and seamless	Accomplished Team member transitions fairly organized	Developing Transitions somewhat disorganized	Unacceptable Some team members did not contribute

Keywords:

IPC, Oral Presentations

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16