- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Three Branches of Government Poster rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Three Branches of Government Poster Three Branches of Government Poster Rubric Code: TXAW494 By smithmotorwheel Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5, 9-12

Three Branches of Government Poster
	Poor 1 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Legislative Branch	Poor Poster is missing most required information and/or is mostly innacurate.	Good Poster is mostly accurate and complete in describing the responsibilities, members, how the members got their jobs, and term limits.	Excellent Poster accurately and completely describes responsibilities, members, how the members got their jobs, and term limits. Related illustration.
Executive Branch	Poor Poster is missing most required information and/or is mostly innacurate.	Good Poster is mostly accurate and complete in describing the responsibilities, members, how the members got their jobs, and term limits.	Excellent Poster accurately and completely describes responsibilities, members, how the members got their jobs, and term limits. Related illustration.
Judicial Branch	Poor Poster is missing most required information and/or is mostly innacurate.	Good Poster is mostly accurate and complete in describing the responsibilities, members, how the members got their jobs, and term limits.	Excellent Poster accurately and completely describes responsibilities, members, how the members got their jobs, and term limits. Related illustration.
Visual Appearance	Poor Poster was not organized and/or completed neatly, did not use color effectively, and may not have used the entire space given. Did not show effort to be visually appealing.	Good Poster used entire space, was mostly neat and organized, colorful, and showed effort to be visually appealing.	Excellent Poster effectively used entire space, was neat and organized, colorful, and showed exceptional effort to be visually appealing.
Working Cooperatively	Poor Students were not able to work cooperatively with partners and required teacher intervention multiple times, which affected the quality of the product.	Good Students worked cooperatively with each other to complete the assignment, but required teacher intervention at times. Quality of the product was not affected.	Excellent Students worked cooperatively with each other to complete the assignment without the need for teacher intervention.