iRubric: Course Delivery Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Course Delivery Rubric

This rubric is used to assess a course delivery plan.

Rubric Code: TB949B

By nwobken92

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Graduate

Final Project Plan Topic: Course Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Basic 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Goals Objectives, and Performance Indicators	Excellent • Goals, Objectives, and Performance Indicators are clear, appropriate and complete. • Objectives are written in terms of student performance. • Objectives are specific, measurable, and well aligned. • Performance Indicators and Objectives is appropriate. • Objectives reflect a variety of perfomances at higher (reasoning levels of Bloom's Taxanomy) • Performance Indicators and Objectives reflect integration across	Proficient • Goals, Objectives, and Performance Indicators are included and complete. • Objectives are written in terms of student performance. • Objectives are specific, measurable, and well aligned. • Performance Indicators and Objectives are appropriate.	Basic • Goals, Objectives, and Performance Indicators are included and complete. • Objectives are written in terms of student performance. • Objectives are adequately specific and measurable, but may be poorly aligned. • There may be too many or too few Performance Indicators or Objectives.	Poor • Goals, Objectives, and Performance Indicators are missing or incomplete. • Objectives are not written in terms of student performance. • Objectives are vague, un-measurable.
Curriculum Lessons and Activities	Excellent • Curriculum and activites are consistent with objectives, well organized, and age appropriate. • Curriculum is accurate. • Curriculum and activities reflect a strong focus on higher level thinking.	Proficient • Curriculum and activities are consistent with objectives. • Curriculum and activities are age appropriate. • Curriculum is accurate.	Basic • Curriculum and activities are weakly linked with objectives. • Curriculum and activities are summarized or outlined though organization may be weak. • Curriculum may be inaccurate in places.	Poor • Curriculum or activites are not consistent with objectives. • Curriculum or activities are extremely vague. • Gross incaccuracies in curriculum.
Presentation Organization, Grammar & Mechanics	Excellent • Organization is very clear. • Grammar and spelling are impeccable.	Proficient • Organization is clear and follows prescribed format. • Only a few problems with grammar or spelling.	Basic • The basic organization of project is complete and can be navigated. • Grammar and spelling are adequate, though there may be some patterns of concern still to be addressed.	Poor • Poorly organized. • Frequent problems with grammar and/or spelling.
Assessment Rubrics, testing, surveys	Excellent • Assessment addresses all three purposes (diagnostic, formative, summative). • Assessment employs methods (selected response, constructed response, performance assessment, or personal communication) consistent with objectives. • A variety of assessment methods are used over time. • Specific samples of questions, performance tasks, and appropriate rubrics are included.	Proficient • Assessment addresses all three purposes (diagnostic, formative, summative). • Assessment employs methods (selected response, constructed response, performance assessment, or personal communication) consistent with objectives. • A variety of assessment methods are used over time.	Basic • Assessment is included but may not address all objectives. • Assessment may not employ methods appropriate to objectives.	Poor • No assessment included. • Assessment is not consistent in any way with the objectives.
Technology URLs, documents	Excellent • Technology is meaningfully integrated to strongly support critical and/or creative thinking. • Students can readily access the technologies required in the course. • The tools and media support the course learning objectives.	Proficient • Technology, when appropriate, is meaningfully integrated to support learning. • Students can mostly access the technologies required in the course. • The tools and media, mostly support the course learning objectives.	Basic • Technology, if applied, may not be integrated in a meaningful way to support learning. • Students can sometime access the technologies required in the course. • The tools and media, sometimes support the course learning objectives.	Poor • Technology is not included. • If technology is included, students cannot access the technologies required in the course. • Technology does not support the course learning objectives
Online Discussion	Excellent • Online Discussion is promoted in the online class. • Students are given plenty of opportunity to discuss online ex: discussion board or blog.	Proficient • Online Discussion is used in the online classroom • Students are some opportunity to discuss online ex: discussion board.	Basic • Online Discussion is brought up in the online class. • Students are given minimal opportunity to discuss online ex: discussion board.	Poor • Online Discussion is not used in the online class. • Students are given no opportunity to discuss online ex: discussion board.

Keywords:

Final Project Plans

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric